Talk:Mystery Date (Mad Men)/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 14:50, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Title: The "Mad Men" part of the title needs to be italicized
Intro: References aren't needed in the lead, so I'd move [1] and [2] down into the meat of the article
Intro: Change "can't" to 'can not'
Production: Maybe say who wrote and directed before jumping right into the section
Production: Explain what a Clio Award is/Is Writing Pad a reputable source? If so, what is it?
References: "down only .1 point from "Tea Leaves"" put a 0 before .1
Reception: "The episode received rave reviews from many publications, though some were mixed on the value of the dream sequence." I would change the wording, as a rave review means that it was mostly positive, which doesn't meld with the mixed reception of the dream

Those are the only issues I spot. On hold for seven days.--Gen. Quon (talk) 20:44, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Problems have been sufficiently resolved. Passing.--Gen. Quon (talk) 18:25, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]