Talk:Nakahara-ku, Kawasaki

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 15:26, May 23, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Districts and municipalities task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was move. —Nightst a llion (?) 10:19, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Nakahara-ku — Nakahara-ku → Nakahara-ku, Kawasaki – Conform to Japan Manual of Style Neier 13:56, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Nakahara-ku, Kawasaki[edit]

The Manual of Style is quite clear that all -ku should be "Naninani-ku, City". Of the current -ku in the Category:Wards of cities in Japan this is the only one without the city name at the end. Neier 13:56, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Does this talk page really need a big green box for an uncontroversial and unopposed page move? Kappa 12:39, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]