Talk:Namie Amuro discography

Creation of this page

I've gone ahead and created a seperate discography page for Namie Amuro to lessen the clutter on her main biographical page. As of right now it's still a work in progress. I will be adding additional information to this page and removing it from her mainpage soon. NATEamx 18:46, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

What happened to the singles table?

The table has been trashed, I see some people have undid changes as vandalism but the table remains trashed. Also, her latest single link is still orange, which I find a bit odd that no one bothered to make a page for it. Unless no one really did make an article for it.

I reverted back to the version before the table became trashed, so we can start editing it again. not sure what happened to it, really, or why the user left is a mess. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.149.236.113 (talk) 06:25, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Covers

can you put the cover for the singles and for the albums like before —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.130.52.21 (talk • contribs).

Covers are already found in the album's articles. They are considered decorative in discographies, which goes against our 8th point of our fair use criteria. -- ReyBrujo 12:38, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

So I just undid all the removal of the covers thinking that it was vandalism, and now they're going to be removed again? I feel like an idiot now... Shinigami Niko 03:44, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Well i think its was better before and why to be against the decorative its more interesting to read that way —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.130.52.21 (talk • contribs). -- ReyBrujo 01:25, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

I agree that it looks much better with album covers shown, they are as much a part of the package as the music and i think it's a stupid rule to not include them, how is it considered decorative in a discography but not on the album article? both pertain to the album... Just saying. --Duphin (talk) 00:23, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Sales Data

Proper citations and references are needed for sales data per WP:V and WP:BLP. Must use reliable, verifiable sources and not fan pages. ORICON does not list total sales and thus www.oricon.co.jp cannot be used because it's numbers can only be looked at for paid subscriptions and thus non-subscribers can not verify that it's actually reliable and correct. However if you can find an ORICON (or other verifiable news article) article that published total sales (Example B'z single data article: http://www.oricon.co.jp/news/ranking/19236/) then that can be used. Also, unfortunately every number must be referenced to the proper source, so also use the WP:CITE technique --Hedatari 02:26, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Doesn't she have a single called

hide and seek? -Anthony- 07:23, 28 July 2007 (UTC) -no, it was from the album "play" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.149.236.113 (talk) 02:57, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Namie Amuro discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081210134907/http://sankei.jp.msn.com:80/entertainments/entertainers/080911/tnr0809110837003-n1.htm to http://sankei.jp.msn.com/entertainments/entertainers/080911/tnr0809110837003-n1.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:32, 17 January 2016 (UTC)