Talk:Nampo Dam

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nampo Dam article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Dams Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dams, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dams on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DamsWikipedia:WikiProject DamsTemplate:WikiProject DamsDam articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject North Korea.

Image of the West Sea Barrage[edit]

I've put a request in with with the Korea Computer Center through their website [1] for the image of the West Sea Barrage located at [2] for use in this article. I'll post when I hear back. kev. (talk) 01:31, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Use of the term "controversial" as the article's second word[edit]

I've just removed the word "controversial" as the second word of the article. In my opinion, there's a place to discuss the controversy, which can be in the later paragraph starting, "Foreign critics..." However, for an encyclopedia article about the barrage as a structure, the introductory phrase shouldn't be "the controversial Nampho Dam..." Of course, I welcome discussion here if anyone should feel the need to revert and discuss. And, this is not to say that the adverse effects from the barrage cannot be discussed later in the article. Saebvn (talk) 22:39, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

rewrite[edit]

this article needs to be rewritten it's terrible.--71.170.100.11 (talk) 07:50, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nampo Dam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110806161310/http://www.travelthewholeworld.com/northkorea.html to http://www.travelthewholeworld.com/northkorea.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:07, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tidal barrage?[edit]

The article says the dam is a tidal barrage. However, the tidal barrage article says that a tidal barrage is designed for power generation. There is no suggestion that the Nampo Dam is doing that.--Jack Upland (talk) 22:44, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]