Talk:Nanded district

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Tabular Data[edit]

There is a lot of data in tabular form, just statistics. If someone would go ahead and wikify it, that would be great, If not and if no one has an objection, I will be deleting this SiegerKranzMeer 20:58, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No objections to deleting the lists. If something's missing a citation it doesn't belong here, in my books. PhnomPencil (talk) 03:02, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

CItations[edit]

This page has almost no citations. I am going to go ahead and add 'citation needed' SiegerKranzMeer 20:43, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why Nanded Division redirects to Nanded District?[edit]

Nanded is a seperate division declared by Maharashtra govt. [1]. It is carved out of the existing Aurangabad Division, though it hasn't come to existence as of date. It comprises of Nanded, Parbhani, Latur and Hingoli Districts. Please look into this matter. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Despardes7 (talkcontribs) 05:17, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nanded district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:16, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]