Talk:National Democratic Congress (Ghana)

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Ghana.

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Social democratic[edit]

I think it is right to describe the party this way as this is how the party describes itself and its policies in the 2004 manifesto. For example "We must contrast their [the NPP and the regimes that ruled Ghana before Rawlings] property-owning concept of democracy characterised by the scramble for illegal wealth by the few with our commitment to social justice and functional democracy through the popular participation of the masses in the decision-making process of state." -Fred.195.92.67.76 13:15, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

POV nomination[edit]

I have raised POV concerns over this line in the main article:

Though this is true, many Ghanaian politicians offer no socio-economic solutions that can be placed on the European and America political spectrum. Therefore, the NDC is only a nominal member of this group.

I don't know Ghanaian politics, and not that much about social democracy; I just know such a claim is general and POV. I would not reject a qualified citation for such a claim, though.--Samuel di Curtisi di Salvadori 23:47, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]