Talk:Nausharo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comments[edit]

I have added back WP India banner. Indus Valley Civilization also has WP India banner. Because, it is part of common history of India and Pakistan. --GDibyendu (talk) 13:41, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Location map[edit]

This seems like a good location map,

Location map for Nausharo Y-barton (talk) 19:27, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nausharo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:11, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An intriguing read[edit]

Saizieu, Blanche Barthélemy de (2021). Parures de l’Indus: Nausharo, Balouchistan, IIIe millénaire av. J.-C.: Entre faire et dire, être et paraître. Paris: Éditions De Boccard. ISBN 9782701805436. appears to be an impressive work, despite my weak command of the language. Will try to use it ass a source in our article. TrangaBellam (talk) 18:02, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]