Talk:Necromunda

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Warhammer 40,000, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Warhammer 40,000Wikipedia:WikiProject Warhammer 40,000Template:WikiProject Warhammer 40,000Warhammer 40,000 articles

Board and table games Low‑importance

	Games portal This article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Board and table gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Board and table gamesTemplate:WikiProject Board and table gamesboard and table game articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Additions[edit]

Expanded cawdor, orlock and the pit fighters. May require some sourcing or rewording. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.26.11.187 (talk) 17:15, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

cleaned[edit]

Have cleaned up this article a bit, to give it a bit more of an encyclopedic tone. Although the introduction has been trimmed as a result It may be worthwhile instead adding section into the main bulk of the article. Also it would be worth writing the article as if it were for the general public rather than too much for GW fans.

Question[edit]

Is Necromunda to WH40K what Mordheim is to WHFB? Wouter Lievens 09:55, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

yeah, pretty much. I don't have Mordheim though, so might not. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.253.219.202 (talk • contribs)

I agree, minor differences mainly due to the different settings etc... But basically Mordheim was based on Necromunda except in a fantasty setting. Mathmo 06:38, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

unreferenced[edit]

Don't understand at all why that tag has been placed there?! Mathmo 06:40, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Potential Split[edit]

It could be worth splitting the 1995 version and 2017 version into their own articles? Not for size reasons, but so that the new edition doesn't add to the bulk it already has further down the article? Ragepyro (talk) 23:11, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not seeing why that would be necessary, but I do see that an IP user added a split tag today to split out Necromunda: Underhive Wars without starting a discussion, and I can see why that may be a good idea. BOZ (talk) 11:41, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think splitting that out makes sense as well. Or rather, split out the video game(s). —¿philoserf? (talk) 16:48, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Understandable, rereading it I think the page might just benefit from a refactor specifying the different editions in each section & a cleaner setting summary. If I manage to get space to add another plate to my array of ones I'm spinning, I'll give it a crack sometime.

Moving the games to their own pages makes a lot of sense though. Ragepyro (talk) 18:17, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]