Talk:Nestea

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Edited Euro-spelling ie Flavor/flavour. TLAGT — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.215.157.32 (talk) 17:45, 19 April 2007

Scope of this page / List of products[edit]

"The beverage comes in several flavours, including Lemon and Raspberry, depending of the country." That's fine, but everything else in the former list Nestle Worldwide is, in my opinion, superflous and smells of free marketing. So while my intial edit was not well commented, I'd maintain that a list of all Nestea flavours in all countries is out of scope for a brand page. Tikiwont 20:12, 18 December 2006 (UTC), updated by Tikiwont 20:54, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

While I'm generally not an advocate of editing out any information just because it might seem superfluous, I tend to agree with User Tikiwont. What's the use of documenting a snapshot of flavours around the world without even adding a date? What do you do when there's a change? Delete discontinued varieties? What I'm hinting at is: We need History! We need the development of the brand! Where did Nestea come from? What were the original products before they started selling fancy bottled tea beverages in Mongolia? I would bet: instant tea powder, but I don't know for sure. --BjKa (talk) 09:59, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wp:fr says: "Nestea is also a brand of instant tea sold as early as the 1970s". Wp:es also talks about "tea based concentrates in liquid and powdererd form". There is also a nice sentence there, saying: "The beverage comes in different flavors, depending on the country" - which is basically all that is appropriate for the main article. More detailed lists just clutter the article and should be moved to a separate page. --BjKa (talk) 10:13, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is the long list of products, broken down into sublists for 50 (!) different countries really necessary? Wikipedia is not a product catalog. Deli nk (talk) 19:23, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nescafe?[edit]

Should this be merged with the article Nescafe? They could form a page like List of Nestle Beverages or something.--SUFC Boy 23:09, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

unsweetend lemon[edit]

Should Unsweeened lemon be added as discontinued in the United States section If you need proof I will take a pic of an old can I still have laying around. Theace22 (talk) 22:55, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The claim that diet Nestea is only marketed in Mexico, US, and Israel is simply not true. I'm in Spain and drinking one right now.88.6.132.30 (talk) 18:43, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The nestle vs coca-cola conflict[edit]

according to this: http://www.forbes.com/sites/greatspeculations/2012/01/16/coca-cola-and-nestle-end-u-s-tea-party-focus-on-overseas-growth/ they divorced because of financial and growing abilities, and not because of a purchase of a Brazilian company. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.191.232.69 (talk) 12:40, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved, sounds like either a hoax or a regional issue (the nominator edited from an Israeli IP address, for proof) Hill Crest's WikiLaser! (BOOM!) 19:18, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nestea → Fuze Tea – Nestea is no longer. It is being replaced by Fuze Tea, a rebranding of the same product, for unknown reasons. As they say, "Same same, new name." 46.116.167.98 (talk) 22:31, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Nestea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:50, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nestea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:19, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why no mention of the original Nestea powder?[edit]

Why is there no mention of the origin of Nestea as an instant tea powder, which was like Nescafe instant coffee? I remember drinking it as a boy in the UK in the 1950s, because I didn't like ordinary tea. According to the Nestlé website, Nestea was launched in 1947 as a hot drink, and the process was invented at around the same time they created Nescafé. In the 1950s, Nestlé referred to it as the ‘twin brother’ of Nescafé! [1] -- Blurryman (talk) 17:45, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite?[edit]

The text reads somewhat like a marketing puff - and 'Since the start of 2017, Nestlé and Coca-Cola agreed to end the iced tea Nestea joint venture' needs a change of tense. Jackiespeel (talk) 11:38, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Nestea&oldid=1213833292"