Talk:New York Cosmos Stadium

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Proposed move[edit]

Hey guys, excellent work with the article so far. Just one suggestion: Shouldn't we move this to Elmont Crossings, as that is the official name of the project? -- Fifty7 (talk) 21:45, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's the name of the whole proposal, with this stadium as the centerpiece... I think the stadium, being the most significant part of the proposal, should be the title of the article, and if warranted the project can be its own article. There's been precedence of that with Barclays Center and Atlantic Yards. --Darkhunger (talk) 02:46, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Gotcha, makes sense! Gonna redirect Elmont Crossings and Elmont Town Crossings to here for now then. -- Fifty7 (talk) 08:42, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Location[edit]

For accuracy's sake, I'm removing the misleading "Queens Village (Queens, New York City)" from the location spot of the Infobox. Although very near the border with Queens, the Belmont Park article makes clear that the racetrack complex (in which the stadium would be built) is within Nassau County. Offside Trap (talk) 20:45, 11 November 2014 (UTC)Offside_Trap[reply]

Wikipedia Worthy[edit]

I was just checking out MLS soccer specific stadiums and this one is such a pipe dream I'm not sure it qualifies as encyclopedic.--MattyMetalFan (talk) 02:39, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I sorta agree. At the very least, the article needs to be updated to reflect that over a year has passed and there's absolutely no movement on this, and unlikely to be any. Sorry Cosmos fans, but the city is more focused on NYCFC, and rightly so, as it's actually a team that draws fans and isn't a minor league club. oknazevad (talk) 15:07, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on New York Cosmos Stadium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:42, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]