Talk:New York State Route 16/GA1

GA Review

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

This is a nice piece of work, but it still has some shortcomings with respect to the good article criteria.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   Inconsistent use of NY vs. Route - also should it be SR? 1.1 - 2nd sentence *might* be able to be rewritten to sound better. 1.2 - last 2 sentences could use commas. 17/86? 1.2 2nd and 3rd par - clean up, there's a ( but no ) and 2nd sentence is a bit poorly written. 1.3 - first sentence needs a bit of cleanup. Why is Erie County Route 572 bolded? Lots of numbers with no abbreviations.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Ref 1 and 11 dead. Ref 3 - is that Yahoo?

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   The section about PA 646 really needed? I still have concerns about that, but I won't make it a further issue for GA.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Hold - This article is comprehensive and doesn't have a whole lot of issues apart from section 1.2. Good work! --Rschen7754 (T C) 07:00, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Done excepting removing the PA 646 section - I am adding a small bit of PA 646 to give a reader a better idea of the road that NY 16 follows. :) -Mitch32^(UP) 19:21, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Updated on the abbreviations - all fixed ;) -- Mitch32^(UP) 21:50, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Passing the article. --Rschen7754 (T C) 22:01, 2 October 2008 (UTC)