Talk:Newberg, Oregon

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Oregon Mid‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Sites of interest[edit]

I'm torn on if Burgerville should really be included on the "sites of interest" section. While it is just another store in a Northwest chain, a local eatery like that may be of interest to people coming from outside Oregon and Washington. Regardless, if it stays, a note about it being a local restaurant, and a wikilink to the Burgerville page should be added. Pcrackenhead (talk) 00:35, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It and pretty much everything else in that section should be removed. Wikipedia is not a travel guide, so these sections are discouraged. I would suggest only those with Wikilinks remain and be moved to a "See also" section. Aboutmovies (talk) 03:46, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done No need to be torn about people adding restaurants (and POV about them), local or not, to articles--99% of the time they should not be included. Katr67 (talk) 18:31, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Beavers[edit]

OK, please, pretty please read about our neutral point of view, specifically about what we call undue weight. We do not double the size of an article by adding one incident over the 150 year history of the community. Nor do we give it its own section. Nor do we use it as a soapbox about beavers. If you want to discuss the cons to beaver removal in general, as was done here as shown by the use of sources that have no mention of Newberg in them, then see about adding that removal information to the page about beavers. Not here. If you want to add some history about the city, I'm sure the coming of the railroad was far more important, or the coming of the highway, and there seems to be no info on either. Aboutmovies (talk) 08:00, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Will consolidate discussion here Talk:Chehalem Creek#Beavers. Aboutmovies (talk) 21:02, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Newberg, Oregon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:52, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]