Talk:Newcomb ball/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

1. Has reliable sources - A lot of unsourced statements.
2. Is written neutrally - Mostly, not completely.
3. No valid cleanup tags
4. Is relatively stable with no edit wars
5. Not specifically concerned with a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint

• Overall not ready. Recommend another peer review before coming back to GAN. iMatthew ^talk at 16:26, 7 September 2009 (UTC)