Talk:Night People (The Human League song)

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Night People (The Human League song) is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

I have removed the last line of this article, which basically stated that the single has failed. I find this an absolutely ludicrous assumption when the digital download has been available for a sum total of 4 days. It may surprise whoever edited this originally, but occasionally it takes longer than a week for a single to gain momentum. --24.132.240.43 (talk) 23:22, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The single is a flop . The line you removed is accurate once the single goes on full rotation with major radio stations or charts in a wiki recognised chart feel free to say so with references. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.132.139.143 (talk) 09:50, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The UK singles charts comes out on Sunday. Unless you are psychic, I'd suggest the burden to provide evidence for the single being a 'flop' is on you, since you are the one adding this premature statement of opinion as fact. I wonder why exactly you have this chip on your shoulder. You also state that the single has has no significant airplay, but this is also an unsourced statement. As far as I'm aware unsourced statements are not welcomed on Wikipedia. Encyclopedic content must be verified. You have provided not a single source, chart position or airplay statistic and until you do your contribution is without evidence. --24.132.240.43 (talk) 00:55, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The statement is accurate, it hasnt! You provide Refs to support airplay cjarts and sales charts to support your statements,untill then it stays. Wikipedia is not for advartising of Fancruft.14:48, 27 November 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.17.194.197 (talk)

Single is a flop[edit]

As of 29/11/2010 single has not even made the UK top 200 download or singles charts or any commercial radio play chart. Ergo it is a flop.

Is some one going to mention that this has been Human League's worst flop of their career, even All I Ever Wanted and I Need Your Loving did miles better by comparison. I'm getting tired of the fanboys trying yo spin this as anything other than a comercial disaster. 82.132.248.40 (talk) 20:17, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- If its a flop then that needs saying, Wiki is not a fan site92.17.255.203 (talk) 22:02, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - why does the fact that this single sunk without a trace after a week, keep getting removed, this is HLs worst flop since "I need your loving" 20 years ago, it's not charted in any mainstream chart or got on a radio play chart. It's a pedigree turkey. The fans are trying to give the impression it's done well. 94.116.162.109 (talk) 16:03, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Worst selling single ever[edit]

This is Human Leagues worst selling single ever, even worse than Love me madly, it has sold no more than 200 copies —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.17.200.226 (talk) 14:25, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Where are your references? You cannot put that up on the Wiki page if you don't have any... Leinsatiableone (talk) 03:33, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Trying to improve the article[edit]

These are my first edits on Wikipedia. I hope I improved the article; I'm trying to make it more neutral.--Octopet (talk) 20:42, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]