Talk:Nimona

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured article candidateNimona is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Good articleNimona has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 26, 2021Good article nomineeListed
April 1, 2022Featured article candidateNot promoted
May 20, 2022Featured article candidateNot promoted
Current status: Former featured article candidate, current good article

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Nimona. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:58, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Nimona (film)" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Nimona (film). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 9#Nimona (film) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Starzoner (talk) 18:59, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Nimona/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Whiteguru (talk · contribs) 10:27, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Starts GA Review; the review will follow the same sections of the Article. --Whiteguru (talk) 10:27, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 


Observations[edit]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

Prose is excellent, follows MOS for writing and references. Deals with a work of fiction that has gone from Webcomic to Audible to Film.

  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

Good work in linking to archived reliable sources.

  1. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):

The text remains on topic and is focussed.

  1. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:

NPOV is preserved.

  1. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:

84,655 page views in the last three months. / 130 editors for 301 edits to page. / Nominator is third most industrious editor.

  1. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

is a book cover (for print edition), suitably sized, qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law. Rationale accepted.

  1. Overall:

This is a review in progress: --Whiteguru (talk) 07:27, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Article is well laid out. Cancellation of film version - a massive disappointment - is an important inclusion. Good work on references, particularly archived references. --Whiteguru (talk) 07:58, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Passed

     

Yay! This is really great to hear. But, yeah @Whiteguru, the cancellation of the film is definitely a massive disappointment. Disney should have never shut down Blue Sky Studios... I sadly don't think the film will ever see the light of day. Historyday01 (talk) 12:45, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A note on Stevenson's pronouns[edit]

When referring to Noelle Stevenson in this article, please note the discussion and consensus on pronouns on the talk page for Noelle Stevenson. HenryCrun15 (talk) 04:20, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to say the same thing! I would also say the same should be applied the She-Ra and the Princesses of Power, Netflix and LGBT representation in animation, Gender and webcomics, Molly Ostertag, Shipping (fandom), List of autistic fictional characters, Steven Universe, Enchanting Grom Fright, Queerbaiting, Media portrayals of transgender people, Masters of the Universe: Revelation, Gay characters in fiction, Media portrayal of LGBT people, and History of transgender people in the United States would also need to be changed, as all of those articles, other than the Steven Universe one, use she/her pronouns for Noelle. --Historyday01 (talk) 05:01, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]