Talk:Ninoy Aquino International Airport/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merging of the Manila Domestic Passenger Temrinal with Terminal 1

Hey dudes, I'm planning to merge the Manila Domestic Passenger Terminal with Terminal 1, and letting Terminal 1 have 2 sections which is the International Terminal and Manila Domestic Passenger Terminal. My reason is that the Manila Domestic Passenger Terminal is actually part of Terminal 1 and Terminal 1 is being split to Terminal 1D and Terminal 1I. Can I have your reactions. I'm planning to do this by Saturday of next week GMT +8. --chris 10:02, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

I don't think they are the same building are they? Physically, they are separate structures, and people don't consider NAIA-1 to be a "part" of a terminal that also includes the Domestic Terminal as another part. That's why the name "Domestic Terminal". In short, I don't support it. Elektrik Blue 82 21:03, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
Same Here, The Terminal's are 2 different things and are descirbed as 2 different things etc... It's fine as it is! (Forgot to login, USER - tomauer ) sorry!
Merging different terminals into one terminal is something I wouldn't agree to, but keeping them separate but under new headers (like Terminals 1, 3 and the international wing of Terminal 2 for international operations and the Domestic Terminal and the domestic wing of Terminal 2 for domestic operations) may seen a bit reasonable. --Sky Harbor 11:41, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
Okay, majority wins I won't merge the said terminals, discussion closed. --chris 09:55, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Japan Airlines

Apparently, there are still JAL-operated flights (not its sister company, JALways) from Manila to Nagoya and Tokyo-Narita[1]. So, we can assume that it has not suspended flights to MNL. Japan Airlines uses flight code "JL", while JALways uses "JO". If you check out Manila's flight schedules through the JAL website, flights with codes "JL" and "JO" [2]. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fifteencounts (talk • contribs)

Apparently, Japan Airlines flights, from Manila to Tokyo-Narita is a Japan Airlines operated by JALways flight (check their timetables). And for there Manila to Nagoya flights, they suspended it as of 29 October 2006 (click this). I hope you would understand. -chris^_^ 11:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC) (p.s. please sign your comments with four tildes (-chris^_^ 11:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)))


MIAA Website

I know the website can be accessed occasionally, but lately i cannot access it, it has been like this for nearly 2 weeks, is there still an active website? if it is not as reliabe as it really should be, i suggest noting it on the page that the airport website is occasionally down, or something similar. sorry if this has been mentioned. --tomauer 13:50, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

    • MIAA - This is the website i accessed for NAIA. It has been fairly updated, and is working condition. Accessed : Tuesday, May 22, 2007. --tomauer 06:27, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Merge

It is unnecessary to have an article solely about an airport terminal, current or future. If the operations of this terminal were separate from the rest of the airport, then this article might be warranted; otherwise this is an unnecessary fork. The main airport article is currently about 15 kB, way less than a long article. Tinlinkin 10:59, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Agree: This is just about a terminal, not really about a famous terminal like the Worldport in John F. Kennedy International Airport, and the Marine Air Terminal in LaGuardia Airport. This Terminal has really no significance. -chris^_^ 09:18, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Isn't it significant that Ninoy Aquino was killed there? Also they tried to kill Paul VI there. Also, perhaps it's better to just let people make articles about whatever they want. They should be free to express it. Someone probably worked hard to expand that article. As long as it's all made up of facts, why not let it be?

Airlines to serve in terminal 3

I am surprised to see American Airlines, Air France, Delta Airlines, Swiss International Airlines and United Airlines coming to serve the terminal. What is the source for this? When did the US airlines previously serve? I tried looking for Delta Airlines and NAIA and so far I found no matches. --58.69.21.135 16:36, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

That will be surprising if all the aforementioned airlines (American, Air France, Delta, Swiss, and United) will come back to Manila and serve NAIA Terminal 3. I wish that it will be open really soon to ease the crowding at NAIA Terminal 1 and to finally bring in more airlines serving Manila because it is a destination that is slowly losing European carriers because of various issues and controversies. I just really hope that the NAIA Terminal 3 will finally open by this year... as in, I really hope and pray for that to happen. --wishfulanthony 06:24, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

where did you find that information?Johnnie ong (talk) 07:25, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Terminal 1 after Terminal 3 opens

Does anyone know what's going to happen with Terminal 1 after Terminal 3 opens? All the Terminal 1 flights are going to Terminal 3, so are they just going to abandon Terminal 1? Or perhaps expand Terminal 2 to include Terminal 1?

Also, are Terminals 1 and 3 even connected? Terminal 3 is by the Baclaran Church, if I remember right -- and that's pretty far off from where Terminals 1 and 2 are. Is it common to have two different parts of the same airport seperate from each other?J.J. Bustamante 04:47, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

    • The 2 terminals (I hear) will be connected by Bus/Jeepney/Train. These are the options i have HEARD of, im not 100%, but i'm sure they have figured something out with all that free time (considering T3 is a empty shell, going nowhere fast)

I Don't think there are any released plan's for T1, The Famous Philippine Architect who designed it (Loscin) did a good job, I't would be sad to see this part of me knocked down (guessing they will Demolish it). We won't know until it happen's by the look's. Would be nice to think of a new Domestic Terminal, I hope that is next on the plan's. Personally, Once all this is done, I would think the focus would be on Clark (CRK) DMIA, and the revolutionary plan's. --tomauer 06:23, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

LH to FRA

Can't book beyond March 30, 2008. Press reports say it's discontinued. LH schedule still has it. I'd say LH forgot to take it off the schedule. "ends March 30" should be there. HkCaGu (talk) 01:01, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

True, but checked OAG.com they still have it though. -chris^_^ (talk) 10:49, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:MIAA Logo.png

Image:MIAA Logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 12:47, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Terminal 3 Will Finally Open, At Long Last

I heard from the news in the Philippines that the controversial NAIA Terminal 3 will open soon, with a soft opening probably later in the year, and the first users of the new terminal will be domestic flights. Finally, after five years of being mothballed, the newest terminal for the Ninoy Aquino International Airport will open! (Source: http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/storypage.aspx?StoryId=119421 Note: this news was presented in Tagalog.)

I hope that this terminal will finally alleviate the current passenger mess Terminals 1 and 2 face for international and domestic travel, and this will be used (hopefully) for all international flights to and from Manila.

wishfulanthony (talk) 5:29, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

I heard that NAIA (all terminals) will not be a long lasting premier gateway of the Philippines, because the Philippine government is transfering the "Premier Gateway" to Diosdado Macapagal International Airport in Angeles. DMIA is set to be one of the biggest airports in the world. They said the project is like the Hong Kong Airport Core Project. The International Airport will be world renowned and servicing more than 110 million passengers annually. It will be the hub of cargo and commercial flights in Asia-Pacific.It is also capable of NASA Space Shuttle and A380. 

Let's just hope that DMIA will starts it's construction ASAP! I can't wait of the new airport. I'm sick and tired of NAIA-1.

NAIA-1 is the most antique airport ever. Now, Pres. Arroyo is urging to start the construction. I hope there's no controversies like NAIA-3 and I hope by 2015, the DMIA will fully operational. Lastly, I hope there will no be corruptions and that the DMIA construction will be transparent. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.157.115.213 (talk) 22:18, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Yes, finally (well, their was a couple of opening dates missed), Terminal 3 is scheduled to actually operate. The whole issue shouldn't have occured in the first place. What a great image to create for international Investors. A total waste of time and money. Politics in the Philippines! yes it is! Bacolod-Silay City International Airport managed to be built, opened, run smoothly, all to schedule. Yet we couldn't get our Vital link in our Capital City to work, the HIGHEST priority, but we can do it on any Coconut island easy. Not the brightest story i've come accross. But good to see it will get use. A Dry run has also been completed i hear. Lovebus 07:46, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

NAIA 3 is finally open! But with a single runway(06/24) being used, airport congestion would still be a burden at NAIA Kjbaldio (talk) 16:20, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Does anyone know when international flights from other airlines will move to NAIA-3? ætərnal ðrAعon 09:28, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

EO No. 732: NAIA-3 TF head

Michael Defensor is the newly appointed (June 19, 2008) head of the Ninoy Aquino International Airport International Passenger Terminal 3 (NAIA-3) by virtue of the June 9, Executive Order No. 732 (creating the Presidential Task Force on the NAIA-3 that was "mandated to ensure the immediate opening and operation of Terminal III.)" The order provides for the NAIA-3 opening based on decisions of the Supreme Court and applicable laws.Abs-Cbn Interactive, Arroyo appoints Mike Defensor as NAIA-3 task force head--Florentino floro (talk) 08:10, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

4 more carriers moving to Naia 3

Some airlines are transferring sometime before June 2009 to the new Ninoy Aquino International Airport Terminal 3.[3]64.195.130.114 (talk) 01:46, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Air Macau

Air Macau still serves Manila - Macau. From Terminal 1. Why is it left out? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.128.32.161 (talk) 08:50, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

http://en.airmacau.com.mo/timetable/doc/W09-271109-english%20version.xls - They no longer operate to MNL on their own metal. Sb617 (contribs) 08:57, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

OK. Strange. In the booking section, same website, MNL is listed (http://en.airmacau.com.mo/routes/macau.asp). Also, no official statements about abandoning the service is found on the site. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.128.32.161 (talk) 11:11, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Turkish Airlines line ups to fly soon in Manila

Guys please pray that this will become reality, check this out : http://philippineairspace.blogspot.com/search/label/Turkish Airlines —Preceding unsigned comment added by Elydelacruz (talk • contribs) 09:38, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Per, WP:V blogs aren't acceptable sources of information. pikdig (talk) 13:39, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

FYI

Base on my research, Air Macau is still operating from Macau to Manila, please see this link:http://www.airmacau.com.mo/timetable/schedules.asp —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.104.148.125 (talk) 07:44, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Doesnt come up on the English Site nor the GDS/Booking Engines. Sb617 (Talk) 08:22, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

This is the site for english, http://en.airmacau.com.mo/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Elydelacruz (talk • contribs) 16:15, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Is this true?

Is it true that ANA flies to T3 at NAIA? I thought T3 was low-cost only! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vjikiun (talk • contribs) 14:28, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

It is true. And no, Terminal 3 is not LCC-only. The official line is that Terminal 3 is the future international terminal which will replace Terminal 1, even if Cebu Pacific wants the terminal for itself. --Sky Harbor (talk) 16:12, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Aircalin

The wiki article on New Caledonian airliner Aircalin says they serve NAIA seasonally.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aircalin — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.128.57.148 (talk) 14:04, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

We can't cite another Wikipedia as a reliable source. Air Calin no longer serve MNL (it is bookable but it is via Osaka-Kansai and operated by 2 different carriers). Snoozlepet (talk) 00:15, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Delta Airlines

There is a flight from Manila to JFK via Narita with Delta flight 172 my cousin took it. I tried to edit it but someone reverted ... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.44.66.142 (talk) 21:22, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Direct flights that pass through hubs are not listed per WP:Airports policy. pikdig (talk) 22:32, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
And those flights 100% most definitely require an aircraft and/or gate change. Narita is a Delta hub. Snoozlepet (talk) 00:11, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Jet Airways soon!

Here are the links to prove that the Jet Airways of India is planning to fly in NAIA on December 2011 http://articles.economictimes.indiat...s-sky-interior — Preceding unsigned comment added by Juliokwatro (talk • contribs) 12:40, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

You haven't even supplied a valid URL. HkCaGu (talk) 14:05, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
here is the right link now, http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2011-09-20/news/30180121_1_jet-airways-boeings-sky-interior — Preceding unsigned comment added by Juliokwatro (talk • contribs) 14:43, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
Once there is a firm date, it can be added to the destination listing. HkCaGu (talk) 15:27, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

2011 Passenger Statistics

Can we update 2011 passenger statistics using this report ? http://globalnation.inquirer.net/26269/naia-hikes-income-begins-rehab Kevin (talk) 11:39, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

A Talk about an air link between Auckland (New Zealand) and Manila (Philippines)

Here is a link, Let's pray that this will be happen soon? http://blogs.mfat.govt.nz/andrew-matheson/auckland-to-manila-%E2%80%94-direct/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.96.112.29 (talk) 13:52, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Separation of Terminal 2 & 3 in destinations

Why Terminal 2 has been separated into North and South:

  1. The wings are clearly labeled such by the airport.
  2. South and North are not directly connected.
  3. South and North does not share any facility except for those pre-check-in.

Why Terminal 3 has not been separated:

  1. Terminal 3 is basically one long terminal.
  2. The glass partition was place in order to divide the domestic and international secure areas. I believe this is a standard everywhere.
  3. Before entering the partitioned area, there is no division. Check-in halls are sorted by counter and it's up to them to divide it into domestic and international. International and domestic passengers share the same public arrival area and same pre-secure departure area.

I think we should look at two airports.

  • At John F. Kennedy International Airport's Terminal 4, it is in the same case as NAIA's Terminal 3. However, destinations have not been separated.
  • At Narita International Airport, Terminal 1 is separated even though there is no physical division. The two wings are interconnected, however, there exists a division between alliances. Airlines that operate in South do not operate in North, and vice-versa.

Just my two cents. pikdig (talk) 17:27, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

In the case of Narita, Terminal 2 is split into two separate buildings (main building and satellite), but airlines are not split as to whether they dock at the main building or the satellite. Kuala Lumpur International Airport is the reverse: airlines are split depending on whether they park at the main terminal or at the satellite.
In the case of NAIA-2, whenever there's an overspill of international flights, South Wing gates are used. The converse is true for domestic flights: North Wing gates are used. Actually, if we remember how Terminal 2 was designed, the division into "domestic" and "international" wings came much later. In fact, the pre-departure area of Terminal 2 is one big pre-departure area: the glass partition separating the North and South Wings has doors which connect both wings together. However, if we look at the way PAL refers to the terminal in its literature, it does not specify between north and south: it just says that its flights are operated at Terminal 2. The fact that only one airline operates from the terminal (two when PAL Express flights to Singapore and Kuala Lumpur move to Terminal 2 come April 1) should render any sort of division irrelevant. --Sky Harbor (talk) 17:48, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
If that's the case, then so be it. pikdig (talk) 09:05, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Philippines-Brazil Flights Soon

http://business.inquirer.net/123167/philippines-brazil-agree-on-new-flights — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.54.54.149 (talk) 13:44, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Can go in prose but not the destinations table until an exact date and a confirmation is known...only pure speculation right now. 68.119.73.36 (talk) 05:02, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Philippine Air Lines preparing for Europe

http://phairtravel.weebly.com/1/post/2013/06/philippine-airlines-preparing-for-europe.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.54.54.140 (talk) 15:15, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Airbus A380 Photo

The plane has no landing gear so either this is a fake photo or the pilot should be given an award. Since the shadow is not consistent with the object casting it, I am leaning towards fake. I move that the image be removed from the article and the possibly deleted from Wikipedia since it is only used in this article. The removal should be effected within seven days. I don't consider a photo to be of any particular necessity for the relevant article and thus do not propose that a replacement be sought. Incidentally I corrected some grammatical errors and rewrote part of the A380 section. Psydexzerity (talk) 01:11, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Psydexzerity (talk • contribs) 09:42, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Pictures for airlines and destinations

hi. if you guys have pictures of airlines in naia, please do put it up. try to limit the pictures to 8. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hithere442 (talk • contribs) 12:24, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

I have removed them, wikipedia is not an image gallery we have commons for that and all these are available if you follow the link. Wikipedia is not a travel guide so images of "destinations" are not appropriate either. MilborneOne (talk) 12:49, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.airport-technology.com/projects/ninoaquino/
    Triggered by \bairport-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 11:43, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 19:30, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 15 April 2014

Can I edit the article thanks Anony0327 (talk) 11:32, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Not done: If you wish to request that a page is unprotected please apply at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection - Arjayay (talk) 12:10, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 3 June 2015

I request to edit Ninoy Aquino International Airport. To change some photos, destinations, etc. Joxloop (talk) 02:39, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Not done: this is not the right page to request additional user rights. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone will add them for you, or if you have an account, you can wait until you are autoconfirmed and edit the page yourself. Stickee (talk) 03:44, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 3 June 2015

Can i edit this article. To change some Destinations and Photos on it Joxloop (talk) 03:55, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Repeatedly asking accomplished nothing. See above. Grayfell (talk) 04:13, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Pandaigdigang Paliparan or Paliparan Pandaigdig?

From what I know, NAIA in Filipino is Paliparan Pandaigdig ng Ninoy Aquino. But as per to the article from Pilipino Star Ngayon (via Philstar.com) as edited by Shhhhwwww!!, it became Pandaigdigang Paliparan ng Ninoy Aquino. What do you think is the right Filipino name for NAIA? SkyHigher (talk) 10:42, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Both are correct I guess. It has to do with the Austronesian alignmnent which makes a complex sentence formation in Tagalog.Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 13:25, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
It works both ways although I've heard Paliparan Pandaigdig used more especially coming from those announcements on local airline flights. The part when the FAs translate flight status into Filipino, like Ilang sandali nasa Paliparan Pandaigdig ng Ninoy Aquino...--RioHondo (talk) 14:38, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Usage is inconsistent, though on the Tagalog Wikipedia we discussed this and stuck with "Paliparang Pandaigdig". Note that this has nothing to do with the Austronesian alignment; it's simply a matter of using Spanish word order (paliparang pandaigdig) versus English order (pandaigdigang paliparan). Aside from being shorter than "Pandaigdigang Paliparan" by one syllable/three letters, it's also what the airlines commonly use (with the exception of PAL, which is inconsistent). --Sky Harbor (talk) 01:48, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Ninoy Aquino International Airport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:50, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Inter-Terminal Transportation

This section gives the impression that Inter-Terminal transport is indeed available in fifteen minutes interval. I am a frequent traveler to the Philippines and on more than one occasion tried to locate this so called shuttle and have never been able to locate them. There are shuttles to Resorts World and other hotels that can then take you to other Terminals. There are no Airport Shuttles. That is another reason why this Airport is rated as one of the worse ones. 4.35.153.99 (talk) 16:13, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

  • There is actually. Added source from the MIAA.--RioHondo (talk) 12:07, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Assassination of Ukol Talumpa & Killing of 3 Other People

Can't find anything in the archive, however SebastianAmor, removed previous reference due to "(The murder of said mayor is not an aviation incident/accident. To add to this, it was committed at the landside area of Terminal 3.)"

Not sure why this is relevant - Article on Heathrow lists the following non-aviation and land-side incidents:

  • On 19 May 1974, the IRA planted a series of bombs in the Terminal 1 car park. Two people were injured by the explosions
  • On 26 November 1983, the Brink's-MAT robbery occurred, in which 6,800 gold bars worth nearly £26 million were taken from a vault near Heathrow. Only a small amount of the gold was recovered, and only two men were convicted of the crime Jaseywasey (talk) 23:16, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 25 April 2016

Gian1912 (talk) 13:18, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Not done: as you have not requested a change.
If you want to suggest a change, please request this in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".
Please also cite reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 14:19, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 27 April 2016

Air New Zealand commencing flights to Manila starting December - 3x weekly using Boeing 767 aircraft http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11617859 Agro038 (talk) 04:05, 27 April 2016 (UTC) Per WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT, a firm date must be known before a destination can be added. Your source does not state a date. HkCaGu (talk) 04:55, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 19 May 2016

Please include Detroit in the Delta Air Lines destinations. According to the latest schedule, Delta's flight from Manila to Tokyo (Narita) continues to Detroit via B747-400 aircraft. http://www.routesonline.com/news/38/airlineroute/267062/delta-w16-preliminary-boeing-747-operations-as-of-18may16/

AmadoIlaganLubidIII (talk) 02:33, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Per WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT, direct flights that stop in a hub are not to be listed as a plane change usually occurs at the airport hub. pikdig (talk) 15:55, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Operational Statistics update from MIAA

Hi Wikipedians. Please do check out the new operational statistics report from the Manila International Airport Authority (MIAA) from 2012 to 2016. This may help us in updating the statistics for MNL for the year 2016. Here's the link: http://125.60.203.88/miaa/images/stories/Downloads/20170116_TotalStats_2012-2016.pdf Thanks. --JoeCo0327 (talk) 03:18, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 22 March 2018

LynxSpider (talk) 11:17, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. qwerty6811 :-) Chat Ping me 15:31, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 1 April 2018

GreenLynxSpider (talk) 13:02, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate.  Spintendo      15:23, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Add a Departure Terminal column in the table of Passenger airlines

let's add the column Departure Terminal to the table in Airlines/Destinations - Passenger. --Miles2north (talk) 17:55, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ninoy_Aquino_International_Airport/Archive_1&oldid=1223210204"