Talk:No Alternative

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Asterisks[edit]

Does anyone know what the asterisks are for in the track list? It can't be to indicate cassette-only tracks, because "Joed Out" is on the cassette and "Burning Spear" isn't. - Ugliness Man 15:42, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The redhot.org page for the album says the asterisks are bonus tracks on the cassette version. However, the CD version that's I've owned for 12 years or so has "Joed Out" but not "Burning Spear" or "Hot Nights." If "Burning Spear" isn't on the cassette or the CD, where is it? Irregard less 04:07, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I must've been half-asleep when I typed that original message, I meant that "Joed Out" is on both the cassette and the CD, but "Burning Spear" is only on the cassette. The asterisk being beside "Joed Out" must have just been an error. Anyway, I fixed the track list now that we've determined what's going on. - Ugliness Man 11:06, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Two Covers?[edit]

Were there two covers for this CD? I remember seeing two covers, one with a boy an another with a girl, but I might be wrong, my CD has a boy on its cover. Vicco Lizcano 16:06, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there were two covers, and both covers are pictured in the article, you just have to scroll down a bit to see the other one. - Ugliness Man 12:58, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I must have missed that somehow... ^_^

Fair use rationale for Image:NoAlternativeGirl.jpg[edit]

Image:NoAlternativeGirl.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:41, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:NoAlternative.jpg[edit]

Image:NoAlternative.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:42, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]