Talk:Nokia 3110 classic

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Finland

	Finland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Finland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FinlandWikipedia:WikiProject FinlandTemplate:WikiProject FinlandFinland articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on 17 August 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Untitled[edit]

Can someone confirm or deny that the 3109 Classic is the same as the 3110 Classic, but without the phone? Martin Packer 12:59, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Same but without the camera or radio - it still has a phone :P 81.137.203.168 (talk) 12:33, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

with the previous verson of the OS as well —Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.126.221.242 (talk) 20:46, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this page considered for deletion?[edit]

Someone placed a "considered for deletion" banner in the article, but no explanation is given in discussion.

This is addressed in an archived discussion. You can view it by clicking here. It has not been nominated recently. Legion211 (talk) 01:32, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]