Talk:Noor-ul-Haq (cricketer)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. Nathan Johnson (talk) 15:20, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Noor-ul-Haq (cricketer)Noor-ul-Haq – There is no other article of the same name, therefore there is no need for a natural disambiguation of the subject. It would seem more appropriate that the subject is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for that name, rather than the target also redirecting to the disambiguation page Tanbircdq (talk) 20:00, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose - sorry, similar problem to other RMs. Due to inconsistent romanization of Pashto this is just a version of Noor ul-Haq (three names to which Noor-ul-Haq correctly redirects currently). If it was a British or American BLP then English-language spelling would be consistent, with a Pashto name it won't be. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:27, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Another article of the same name does exist, Noor-ul-Haq (book), as well as the similarly-named articles mentioned above. IgnorantArmies 13:27, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. If there were to be a primary topic (which I'm not proposing) it should certainly be Noor-ul-Haq (book). Meanwhile if the proposer wants to move this article, he should suggest renaming to Noor-ul-Haq Malekzai. SamuelTheGhost (talk) 15:44, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose; this person is far from the only subject whose name might be rendered as Noor-ul-Haq. I think we'd be better off with a dab (and from there I fall in line with In Ictu Oculi's argument) bobrayner (talk) 19:36, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.