Talk:Nordyke v. King

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Firearms Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Case history[edit]

Nordyke v. King - gun show ban/incorporation of 2nd Amendment - ("Nordyke I"), 229 F.3d 1266 (2000); ("Nordyke II"), 27 Cal. 4th 875 (2002); ("Nordyke III"), 319 F.3d 1185 (2003); ("Nordyke IV"), 364 F.3d 1025 (2004); ("Nordyke V"), pending (argued January 15, 2009 audio)^[1]

References

^ The Volokh Conspiracy, Briefs on Whether the Second Amendment Should Apply to the States Via the Fourteenth, September 12, 2008. See also the Calguns Foundation Wiki, Nordyke v. King; and Of Arms and the Law, Amicus briefs filed in Nordyke, October 1, 2008.

Conflict of interest disclosure[edit]

Although I can participate in the discussion group and make minor grammar and formatting adjustments - I cannot myself make substantive edits on this issue since I was part of the legal team (as a 3rd-year law student/paralegal/clerk) representing the Nordykes. [On the original briefs filed with the court by the Nordykes, you will see my name and signature on proofs of service]. The original sentence used to start this article was a cut-and-paste of a sentence from the Second Amendment article written by another Wikipedia editor. Although I cannot contribute myself, I may be helpful in pointing out specific resources that can be used - or not - by other WP editors of this article. - Davodd (talk) 08:30, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Nordyke v. King. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091008062730/http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/9th-ca-gun-case-on-hold/ to http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/9th-ca-gun-case-on-hold/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:22, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[1] The Volokh Conspiracy, Briefs on Whether the Second Amendment Should Apply to the States Via the Fourteenth, September 12, 2008. See also the Calguns Foundation Wiki, Nordyke v. King; and Of Arms and the Law, Amicus briefs filed in Nordyke, October 1, 2008.

[1]