Talk:Northrop F-20 Tigershark/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Nick-D (talk) 00:59, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

I'll review this article today or tomorrow. Nick-D (talk) 00:59, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Comments

I think that this article meets the GA criteria. I've got some sugge

• "Offered as a low-cost option, the F-20 was significantly more expensive than the F-5E, but much less expensive than other designs like the $30 million F-15 Eagle" - the article doesn't say what the F-20 was estimated to cost
• How many aircraft did Bahrain order in November 1982?
• "Such approval was increasingly granted starting in 1982" - what approval this is for is unclear, though from the paragraph it seems to be for F-16 exports
• "It was rumored that the aircraft was sold at a loss to keep Northrop's F-20 out of the market." - this should be a matter of public record by now (from the company's public accounts and US government expenditure records), so can it be established or disproved?
• Where any South Koreans punished for accepting bribes?

Assessment against GA criteria

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Nick-D (talk) 06:36, 6 August 2011 (UTC)