Talk:Not even wrong/Archives/2020

Jung?

From my talk page, regarding this edit:

Hello Bill, the relevance is precisely that Pauli helped Jung enormously in his thinking, relating quantum physics to psychology. See for instance, their correspondence: Jung, C. G.; Pauli, Wolfgang; Meier, C. A.; Zabriskie, Beverley; Roscoe, David (2014-07-01). Atom and Archetype: The Pauli/Jung Letters, 1932–1958. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-16147-1. Pauli was patron and lecturer at the C. G. Jung Institute, Zürich from 1947 until his death. The delicious thing is that Wikipedia has plonked Jung's Synchronicity into Pseudoscience, despite Pauli's contributions to its formulation. Jung and Pauli did not necessarily agree, but their debate started a decades long ongoing discussion and they produced a joint paper: Jung, Carl Gustav, and Wolfgang Ernst Pauli. [1952] 1955. The Interpretation of Nature and the Psyche, translated from German Naturerklärung und Psyche. So will you consider reverting your reversion, please? --Po Mieczu (talk) 17:09, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Be that as it may, how does that relate to the subject of this article? Any connection seems tenuous, at best. Inviting others to comment, Just plain Bill (talk) 17:35, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

We'd need a third-party making the connection that "Pauli helped Jung enormously in his thinking" before including it in this article. — The Hand That Feeds You:^Bite 17:03, 8 December 2020 (UTC)