Talk:NuGet

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Microsoft

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Microsoft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Chocolatey was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 16 April 2016 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into NuGet. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Free or proprietary?[edit]

It says "free and open source" but "License Proprietary" at the same time. Is that a mistake? Cheers S. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.15.245.210 (talk) 13:36, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What is the etymology of the Nu characters?[edit]

Can someone describe where the characters Nu originated from? .NET utility? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.85.27.20 (talk) 09:56, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why advert banner?[edit]

I don't think it reads like promotional material. I recommend deleting it if the reader of this topic also agrees with me. Hutxone (talk) 13:32, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have made some edits to reduce the promotional language on this article (diff). I also think that it doesn't read like promotional material anymore, and I have removed the advertisement / promotional language maintenance template (Special:Diff/1146152675). Wysholp 🧊 (talk) 02:21, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"OneGet" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect OneGet and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 27 § OneGet until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Aaron Liu (talk) 20:17, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]