Talk:Nyönpa

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tibet Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tibet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TibetWikipedia:WikiProject TibetTemplate:WikiProject TibetTibet articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

References[edit]

More than half of the references are from another Wiki which is unacceptable per WP:USERG. Some of the references simply say "See Chapter Two in DiValerio" but that isn't a valid format or even helpful information. This article is terribly referenced and needs improvement. 65.28.236.17 (talk) 00:44, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to jump in and clean up the references. It would be a great service to us all. AD64 (talk) 15:58, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Additions to the lead[edit]

Pinging @Skyerise to avoid an edit war. While the lead indeed repeats the body's key facts, it does so in an extremely editorializing way, with wordings such as stands as a testament to the dynamic nature of Tibetan Buddhism, fearless embrace of unconventional practices or inspire understanding of spiritual growth towards greater self-awareness and enlightenment. This is not the kind of NPOV wording expected of an encyclopedic lead. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 21:44, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So, copyedit it? Skyerise (talk) 21:48, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. To be fair, I do not wish to offend, but I am surprised that an experienced editor such as yourself would write something that editorializing without copyediting it before. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 22:42, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's fair. Must have been having an off day... Still, improvement is usually better than removal. Skyerise (talk) 12:16, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]