Talk:O (Cirque du Soleil)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Opening comment[edit]

When was "O" first performed? That would be good info for all the cirque de soleil show pages

Also: the Bellagio "O" ad is visible in Ocean's 11.

Fair use rationale for Image:CirqueO.png[edit]

Image:CirqueO.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:09, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PR language in this and other Cirque show articles[edit]

The "Characters" and "Acts" sections of this article and other articles about Cirque du Soleil shows are largely characterized by the flowery, unencyclopedic language of Cirque du Soleil's playbills and website. It's essentially PR language, designed to sound pretty and profound, and it sometimes bears scant resemblance to the show creators' ultimate intentions or what actually appears onstage. As fascinating it sounds, it's not really appropriate for the narrative voice of a Wikipedia article to say, for example, that a church bell appearing in an act "beckons all to join the party… of life, love and death" as though that contributed to our factual understanding of the show!

So, many of these sections need to be re-written entirely to comply with WP:MOSFICT. The difficulty may lie in finding reliable sources for information to replace the current poetry. I have been reluctant to remove the offending sections until something better came along to replace them... but it has been several years now and I'm beginning to wonder if their presence is setting a self-perpetuating precedent, discouraging editors from adding factual content. AtticusX (talk) 03:06, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I'm also not sure that the article should lead off with a "History" section that consists solely of awards the show has won. superbatfish (talk) 20:33, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I've been reworking a lot of the CdS articles, and unfortunately some do have quite a bit of advert content left in the Cast and Acts sections. If you could perhaps review a couple show pages and tell me which pages you feel are some of the better ones, I'll try to use that as a base to clean up this one. I've also been drafting a little information for the history, but have yet to add it, but yes as it stands the History section is a little weak because of the lack of more information, agreed. (Brent.austin (talk) 21:59, 1 April 2011 (UTC))[reply]

designed to look like what?[edit]

14th century opera house? Is that a deliberate mistake? Opera didn't exist for another 200 years, let alone opera houses... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.45.182.105 (talk) 15:57, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on O (Cirque du Soleil). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:59, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]