Talk:Oak Lawn, Dallas

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dallas-Fort Worth, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Dallas-Fort WorthWikipedia:WikiProject Dallas-Fort WorthTemplate:WikiProject Dallas-Fort WorthDallas-Fort Worth articles

United States: Texas Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).

LGBT studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles

Untitled[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was PAGE MOVED per request. -GTBacchus^(talk) 04:22, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

Oak Lawn, Dallas → Oak Lawn, Dallas, Texas — Rationale discussed at WP:DALLAS and across United States city WikiProjects. drumguy8800 C T 11:01, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Survey[edit]

Add * '''Support''' or * '''Oppose''' on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.

Support. All neighborhoods in Philadelphia, Los Angeles, Seattle, quite a few Columbus ones, and more importantly in this instance, all other Dallas ones are in the neighborhood, Dallas, Texas format. This article would already be moved except that at one point the exact reverse operation was taking place due to a different community consensus. The process of going through an administrator is just a formality in this instance, and there really isn't much to vote on. drumguy8800 C T 04:17, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

Add any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Government and infrastructure[edit]

I'm not sure this section is needed, but if it is, it should be fully populated.

A better section might be "Major buildings," "Major landmarks," or "Government offices," which would include major buildings or government offices not listed elsewhere, i.e. not schools, etc. Other items I'd like to see in such a category: police and fire stations, libraries, etc. for government buildings, and historic or other notable landmarks in a major buildings or major landmarks category. JFK died in Parkland Hospital which I think is a government-run hospital. Is that in this neighborhood? If so, it should go in this section. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 15:57, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article[edit]

Need to find:

Flick, David. "Closing time for Crossroads, center for gay activism." The Dallas Morning News. December 1, 2007.

It might be in a print source too. WhisperToMe (talk) 20:37, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is this the wanted article? "Closing Time For Crossroads, Center For Gay Activism." - Jennasl (talk) 20:48, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This article requires a total rewrite. There are claims that are not supported by facts or reference, and old references such as "gayborhood" which is no longer true except for the bars. I will be happy to take it on. SecTreOLC (talk) 22:03, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Oak Lawn, Dallas/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

This article is long.. it has a lot of good information in it but it really needs some images and some cleanup and a broader subject range. drumguy8800 C T 04:32, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 04:32, 26 October 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 01:39, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Oak Lawn, Dallas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090728024756/http://www.caribbeannetnews.com:80/2004/12/17/close.htm to http://www.caribbeannetnews.com/2004/12/17/close.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.texasmonthly.com/articles/going-public/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.dallasobserver.com/1997-11-13/news/school-s-out/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:06, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]