Talk:Obando, Bulacan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Suggested Correction[edit]

"Obando is landlocked, bordered by two cities from Metro Manila namely Valenzuela City in the east, Navotas and Malabon City in the south, Bulacan in the north, and the waters of Manila Bay in the west."

How can Obando be landlocked when the sentence itself states that it is bordered by "the waters of Manila Bay in the west?" It is suggested that the sentence be revised as follows: "Obando is bordered by Valenzuela City to the east, the cities of Navotas and Malabon to the south, the Municipality of Bulacan to the north, and the waters of Manila Bay to the west." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.194.244.240 (talk) 07:02, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Obando, Bulacan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:49, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Seav and Sky Harbor: I propose that the article on Binuangan be merged with this page as it lacks notoriety to warrant its own Wikipedia article. The Binuangan page is being used by pseudohistorians as a means to proselytize the so-called "Binuangan Civilization" even though such claims have yet to be proven independently by real scholars like archaeologists and historians of pre-colonial Philippines. We can include a section on Binuangan here or create a separate article once the claim has been verified by appropriate agencies such as the National Historical Commission of the Philippines and the National Museum.

Cheers! — Lawrence Ruiz (talk) 12:16, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am favor of the merge. Minus the unverified prehistoric information, there is nothing in the article that would merit it being a separate article (without prejudice to future possible notability). —seav (talk) 13:21, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Watched an episode of Kapuso Mo, Jessica Soho before, and it stated that the claims made by a historic society/association are yet to be confirmed.JWilz12345 (talk) 08:57, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:33, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]