Talk:Occupiers' Liability Act 1957/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: ceranthor 14:56, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Prose[edit]

Looks good overall. A couple errors.

This is another extension of a common law principle; in Glasgow Corporation v Taylor [1922] 1 AC 44, a seven year old child after eating poisonous berries from a bush in a park - he died, I'd assume?
The berries, which looked like cherries or blackcurrants, were found by the House of Lords to constitute an "allurement" to the child, who found Glasgow Corporation, which owned the park, liable. - probably better with a citation after this
Both done. Ironholds (talk) 22:11, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Images[edit]

One "infobox" type image checks out.

~~More later. ceranthor 14:56, 17 January 2010 (UTC)~~[reply]

Much apology for the belated review. I finished reading this the other day, found no more problems, and didn't have time to finish this. It's a sure pass, for a well-written [if boring:] article. ceranthor 00:02, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]