Talk:Ocean's

Image copyright problem with File:Ocean's Eleven 2001 Poster.jpg

The image File:Ocean's Eleven 2001 Poster.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --20:44, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Rotten Tomatoes Changes

I've taken liberties to update the percentages and number of reviews, but am curious as to what to do about the "Overall" and "Cream of the Crop" headings. These have been changed on RT and now are reflected as "All Critics" and "Top Critics." I've changes the latter, but left the former, as I feel "Overall" provides a better sense of what the numbers represent. --75.100.22.121 (talk) 06:25, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

• Never mind. I went ahead and changed "Overall" to "All Critics," as it looked out of place otherwise. --75.100.22.121 (talk) 06:29, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Ocean's Trilogy.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Ocean's Trilogy.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:47, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Logan Lucky

I removed the See also section with a link to Logan Lucky. It is another heist film directed by Steven Sodebergh but that alone is not a good reason to add it without any context or explanation. The film includes a joke where the press refer to the heist crew as "Ocean's Seven-Eleven" but that still is not a good reason to add it to the article as a single item list.

I don't think Logan Lucky should be added to this article at all. But if someone really wanted to add it then maybe they could find a few critics (reliable sources) comparing Logan Lucky to Ocean's Eleven, and explaining with text how it was influenced by or connected to this film series, then just maybe it would be worth mentioning. It should be clearly explained why it is included, readers should not need to figure out that it is another heist film from the same director, and that he made a joke about it being like Ocean's Eleven, or that critics compared it to Ocean's Elven, if any of that actually is notable it should be clearly explained with text proper references. -- 109.76.144.223 (talk) 06:25, 26 March 2021 (UTC)