Talk:Ockley railway station

Trains: in UK Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

Surrey Low‑importance

	Surrey portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Surrey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Surrey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SurreyWikipedia:WikiProject SurreyTemplate:WikiProject SurreySurrey-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Difference of Opinion About Writing Style of Page[edit]

The article as it stands is in nothing like an encyclopedic style. Was it meant to be a 5000 word essay? Words such as "grisly" "sadly" and "heroic" indicate some sort of cultural vanity rather than an objective stance.--SilasW (talk) 18:06, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Who is SilasW to dictate what style should be used for writing this page. He may be some mealy mouther reader of The Independent who doesn't like strong opinions but the nature and state of train services from Ockley and the inadequate evening service and non existent Sunday service is a matter eliciting strong comment. Unless SilasW actually lives in Capel or Ockley and uses the station then I would suggest it is none of his business. Wikipedia is a modern world living encyclopedia for everyday users and not some dry academic tone designed not to offend the sensibilities of librarians. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Capvermell (talk • contribs) 00:33, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]