Talk:Office of Economic Opportunity

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Indigenous peoples of North America

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States History

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject United States HistoryTemplate:WikiProject United States HistoryUnited States History articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject United States History To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : United States History articles needing attention
Infobox : United States History articles needing infoboxes
Stubs : Stub-Class United States History articles, Category:United States history stubs
Other :
- Place either of the following WikiProject banners on United States History-related articles and assess:
  - {{WikiProject United States History|class=|importance=}}
  - {{WikiProject United States|class=|importance=|UShistory=Yes|UShistory-importance=}}

Native American impact section[edit]

I added Peacock warning to the Impact on Native Americans section. this makes large proclamations about its impact and is biased towards a certain (imo very colonial) view of Native Americans' capacity. ("never been given the chance for major responsibility", etc). this whole section needs citations where it mentions impact. PaulSutherland (talk) 18:36, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Office of Economic Opportunity under a Cabinent control?[edit]

where in the government heirarchy did the office fit? direct reporting to the President or under control of a Cabinet division (Treasury?)?--68.173.2.68 (talk) 08:32, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OEO was a cabinet level department and during most of its time had direct access to the President. Of course practially speaking different presidents treated OEO differently. But Nixon and Reagan hated the program because of the efforts it made on behalf of poor people and especially minorities. Many positive results, that had impacts on native american's and mexican americans came from legal services and happened in California. Hence part of the reason why conservative tried and finally ended OEO.

However Community Action Programs still exist and if you listened to The President's speech on Tuesday he said that he would cut the program even though it was something he believed in. Lemurbaby (talk) 17:34, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Citation Needed[edit]

I don't really know how to do this, but I found a legit citation for William B Mullins being the co-founder here: http://www.nytimes.com/1990/05/16/obituaries/w-b-mullins-52-a-founding-official-of-the-peace-corps.html

Who’s the contributor obsessed with editorializing?[edit]

There are so many "Editorializing" notes across a large portion of this article that it looks like someone has attempted to do their own guerilla editorializing by dropping in so many of them. I am not a contributor to this article, except to add this Talk point, as I'm not especially conversant with its subject matter, so I don't think I'll edit it. I hope others will step up. At least the ones who added so many editorial insinuations didn't remove the portions that they assert are problematic. Fjeinca (talk) 17:58, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]