Talk:Oh My My (album)

Requested move 27 September 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved (non-admin closure) — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 02:30, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh My My (album) → Oh My My
Oh My My → Oh My My (disambiguation)

– The other topics were barely getting any traffic before the album's article was created, and that's still the case.[1] Unreal7 (talk) 22:57, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Making the OneRepublic album the primary topic would be obvious recentism; it's not even out until October 7, so of course it's going to have a lot of pageviews. The songs by the Monkees and Ringo Starr were both Billboard Hot 100 hits, with Starr's song even peaking in the top 5 in both the US and Canada. I don't think this album can be said to pass the second aspect of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC so early. Nohomersryan (talk) 23:39, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per WP:TOOSOON. Let's wait until it is released, OK? SST flyer 09:57, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose and can I suggest that next time this is proposed the template be placed on the page being dislodged and "Oh My My" (The Monkees song), 1970 "Oh My My" (Ringo Starr song), 1973 article Talk pages be informed. In ictu oculi (talk) 10:12, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Nohomersryan has said everything I wanted To say too, TOOSOON etc etc. –Davey2010^Talk 20:22, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.