Talk:Old Mobile Site

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Alabama

This article is part of WikiProject Alabama, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Alabama on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlabamaWikipedia:WikiProject AlabamaTemplate:WikiProject AlabamaAlabama articles

Old Mobile Site received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Merger[edit]

Probably a good idea. I'm not sure anyone would find the article otherwise. JodyB_talk 03:45, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I created the Old Mobile Site article and still plan to finish it. I consider it a work in progress. I estimate that it will reach a size of three to four times its current size and can reach Good Article status. I would suggest that I (or me with other people from Wikiproject Alabama) complete the article before considering merging. I believe the article should be linked to from the appropriate articles to improve visibility. Based on the possiblity of expansion and linking from other aricles, I tend to oppose merging of the article. In addition, sites on the National Register of Historic Places traditionally have their own articles. I am open to further discussion on the point but at this time would oppose merging. Leeannedy 21:59, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As the article is a work in progress with intention of cross referencing, I'll withdraw my merge proposal. Regards, Вasil | talk 00:27, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds fine. I have assessed as start class at the moment. JodyB_talk 17:12, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinates[edit]

Just noticed that the coordinates seem to be off a bit. The infobox map shows the site in Mississippi. JodyB_talk 17:14, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be the map itself. The coords are accurate in the off-wiki Google map. JodyB_talk 17:15, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Figured it out - fixed JodyB_talk 17:23, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How did you know what x/y values to use? Вasil | talk 17:35, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is a chart here that purports to give you the values. However it is off a good bit, shifted east I think. I ended up with some trial and error to get it fixed. JodyB_talk 20:12, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Still wrong[edit]

The dot shows down around Tampa here. /Blaxthos 00:52, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reassessed[edit]

I have reassessed the article as B class after finding the current version to be well-researched, having verifiable and reliable references, having a good layout, and including relevant photos(which are hard to come by on this subject). Great work Leeannedy. Altairisfar (talk) 00:28, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gouvernor[edit]

Pierre Le Moyne d'Iberville states he sailed 1699 to French and 1706 he is in Havanna. Jean-Baptiste Le Moyne, Sieur de Bienville states, that he was at 1701 ascended to the governorship. --Franz (Fg68at) de:Talk 07:25, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]