One Room Disco was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 16:48, May 23, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
Taking this review soon! Looks a bit messy right now, but we'll see if it's up to my standards. — VAUGHANJ. (TALK) 07:39, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I hate to do this, but I'mma have to Quick fail this article and this GAN itself. Not only is most of the stuff in the article are unsourced, but you don't have sources for the charting of the song itself. On top of this, the article is poorly written, and it is far from being broad in its coverage. — VAUGHANJ. (TALK) 07:58, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Quick fail this article and this GAN itself. Not only is most of the stuff in the article are unsourced, but you don't have sources for the charting of the song itself. On top of this, the article is poorly written, and it is far from being broad in its coverage. — VAUGHAN J. (TALK) 07:58, 19 November 2023 (UTC)