Talk:Onslaught (Marvel Comics)

Comics: Marvel Mid‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Marvel Comics work group.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Ultimate Onslaught[edit]

Ultimate X-Men #92 depicts Xavier returning from Cable's future in a Magneto/Onslaught looking suit of battle armor. Most notably, he has glowing red eyes on the cover. Would it be fair to call this version of Xavier "Ultimate Onslaught", or at least a reference thereto? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.173.249.8 (talk) 03:15, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted the "Morrison/Millar created Onslaught" tripe; it's widely known that Scott Lobdell and Mark Waid were the ones who created Onslaught; Lobdell came up with the name and the power level threat of the character while Waid was the one who came up with the idea of him being the bastard psychic spawn of Magneto and Xavier. [[[BakerBaker]]]

Beginning this discussion page as this article has been tagged for copyedit for over a week. I've done a pass at the "character history" section to reduce storytelling rhetoric into a more factual exposition (e.g. removed unneeded references to character motivation as well as repetitive statements). Markeer 17:20, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

i love vallejo but...[edit]

could we get a more accurate and perhaps less monumentally ugly picture as the main pic please?WookMuff 09:04, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yay WookMuff 09:05, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Onslaught Saga"?[edit]

Where does this term come from? --Chris Griswold (☎☓) 12:31, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dunno. From what I recall it was simply called "Onslaught"

Something I want to bring up. "Onslaught" was a mess and there should be more of a creative focus to showcase that. Reading through the indexes at TheXAxis.com, Paul O'Brien points out they came up with the idea for the story before they had even settled on who the character was and what his objectives were. And then it was shoehorned in to being a part of "Heroes Reborn". It was being made up as they went along. In fact "Road to Onslaught" doesn't clarify the character's objectives at all, because it bears little relation to the finalized plot in the stories. It's no wonder Scott Lobdell has referred to the entire thing as "A work in progress". WesleyDodds 12:37, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

He was all magneto "take over the humans" at first, then he was all "everybody's going down". Fairly simple i felt. Also, major cosmic x-men storylines seem to get tagged with saga, ala dark phoenix, but i really recall it being referred to as this in Wizard.WookMuff 21:03, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I worked in a comics store, so I read the whole thing, but even now, Onslaught's goal is murky to me. People on Wikipedia like to add "Saga" to stuff. Oh, I'm uploading that Xorn picture right now. --Chris Griswold (☎☓) 12:42, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a few of those x-Axis links: [1], [2], [3] WesleyDodds 12:54, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Marvel Legends depiction[edit]

I recently started collecting Marvel Legends figures, due to my childhood love of the X-men cartoon and a few comics here and there. I am in no way an authority or a scholar, however. Thus, the inclusion of Onslaught confused me, seeing as how he was given build-a-character status next to Apocalypse, Sentinel, Giant Man, and Galactus. Finding this page was incredible, and gave quite a bit more value to the Onslaught figure in my mind, especially considering it is considerably smaller than the other build-a-character sets.

With that said, it might be worthwhile to include a section on the Marvel Legends depiction (I assume it is of Onslaught's second form), as well as its artistic basis. Personally, I'm quite intruiged to learn why Onslaught's depiction is almost insect-like, especially in the face. Luckily, this article has gone a long way to explaining why his face is metallic for me. Athenor 04:13, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The iluminatti mini series has shownXavier to acess the Mind gem, a gem that symbolizes the collective thoughts of reality, how this is tied into onslaught has not yet been revealed but fan speculation has increased over the connection of the onslaught appeareance and the mind gem.

Onslaught Reborn[edit]

How many issues of this comic have been released? Where are all these plot summaries from and are they accurate? Am I the only one who thinks that this contradicts everything that happened in heroes return, the Heroes Reborn One-shots, and Fantastic Four #25-28 and that years ff annual? WookMuff 10:36, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There are suppose to be four issues, with the current Onslaught Reborn sunmmary only describing the first two. I have the first two issues, and I tried to correct inaccurate summaries, but it's been a long time since my last edit and I've pretty much given up with bothering with it. Personally, I don't think they did a very good job with this as an event that chronologically predates Civil War, and for some reason, the last two issues have suffered significant delays and shortages. If my local dealer is correct, then the lateness is attributed to the issue simply not making the deadline. ULTRAZORD 22:35, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Onslaughtappears.png[edit]

Image:Onslaughtappears.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 06:03, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Onslaughtmetamorph.png[edit]

Image:Onslaughtmetamorph.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 06:04, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Onslaughtreborn2.png[edit]

Image:Onslaughtreborn2.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 06:05, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Onslaughtripgem.png[edit]

Image:Onslaughtripgem.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 06:06, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Onslaughtwarhumanity.png[edit]

Image:Onslaughtwarhumanity.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 06:08, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Onslaught21.jpg[edit]

Image:Onslaught21.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:27, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Cliffnotes" section?[edit]

I dunno, doesn't seem wiki-ish to me. A lot of slang, not much fact, and a lot of speculation/discussion. Don't get me wrong, I found it amusing (saved it to my hard drive and all) but I'm not sure it belongs there.

WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required[edit]

This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject. If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class. The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject. Comics-awb (talk) 17:12, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Not sure what has happened here but the article seems to have disappeared [4]. Coverage is poor and poorly referenced. I can't, in good conscience even give this a C. (Emperor (talk) 19:24, 23 October 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Everything needs to be redone in the historical present tense[edit]

Yes and unfortunately it's a lot of work to convert everything and may require a lot of work to do it all. Might need to get reworded as well.Reijiro (talk) 19:41, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Onslaught (comics). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:51, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image deletion nomination(s)[edit]

One or more images currently used in this article have been nominated for deletion as violations of the non-free content criteria (NFCC).

You can read more about what this means and why these files are being nominated for deletion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics#Image deletion nominations for NFCC 8 and 3a.

You can participate at the deletion discussion(s) at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 April 26. If you are not familiar with NFCC-related deletion discussions, I recommend reading the post linked above first.

Sincerely, The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:52, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]