This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Databases, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.DatabasesWikipedia:WikiProject DatabasesTemplate:WikiProject DatabasesDatabases articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
A fact from Open Syllabus Project appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 October 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by RoySmith (talk) 22:09, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d:Meets all requirements. Really interesting subject, and probably would be really practical/helpful for lots of readers haha. Would opt for ALT0 since it covers the topic more broadly. Lots of interesting nuggets in the article's Notable findings section and there's many ALTS that could probably be made for this nom, so that's why I'd probably go with ALT0. Good job on this. Soulbust (talk) 14:43, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, misread QPQ. Realize now that this was nominator's way of saying QPQ was to be done. My fault here. Should be listed back at Awaiting approval page. Soulbust (talk) 15:08, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]