Talk:Operation Woodrose

India Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Asian / Indian / South Asia C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Indian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force

bias[edit]

This article is terrible. It is clearly written from a Sikh point of view, when articles should be neutral, it is unclear about when this took place, and it does not cite any sources. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:30, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will agree that this article seems written from a certain point of view. However, the sources provided seem reputable and althouh I do not have access to all of them, I think the allegations for the most part seem logical. Regardless, I have nominated this article for a POV check. Vedant (talk) 16:32, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

sorry to say it but it is true as hell —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.227.162.46 (talk) 09:16, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I did feel that there is a "certain point of view" with his article. It does not feel like an earnest report let alone an encyclopedia article. But do I believe it? Yes, parts of it but not all. The operation did have faces of genocide and utmost cruelty. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.204.83.185 (talk) 11:54, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I tried checking some of the books listed in the references... and none of them appear to have a shred of what is written in the article. it appears that someone wrote this, then liberally peppered the text with non relevant references that cannot be checked on the web. Please suggest action. Tigerassault (talk) 16:20, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah-ha! check this out http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Operation_Woodrose&direction=next&oldid=319563578

the article was written out by someone with a very POV style. Then, when threatened with deletion, the article was peppered with citations most of them referring to books which do not say anything of the type mentioned in the article.Tigerassault (talk) 16:29, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Operation Woodrose/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

This article should be promptly removed. In fact, it should not be given the dignity of being called an article: it is a pamphlet and a propaganda tool. It is parochial, based on extremely dubious and biased hearsay information and is written with the malicious agenda to inspire in Sikhs hatred for their Indian brethren. Please remove this article: it has no place in civilized society.

Last edited at 18:07, 31 July 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 01:54, 30 April 2016 (UTC)