Talk:Opinion polling for the 2017 Iranian presidential election
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Online polls[edit]
User:GTVM92: An online poll is not reliable nor verfiable, because the votes are ongoing and constantly changing. Plus, new96.ir is not a polling firm. I remove the online polls, please do not add them againg. If you have any reason on why we should include them, bring it here. Pahlevun (talk) 10:28, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Write a mistake in the text written ippo website. The numbers of new voters to show insight. rohani 56.1 raisi 22.1 ghalibaf 19.2 ippogroup.com t.me/IPPOGROUP Aysa.cooky (talk) 11:43, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
- User:Aysa.cooky. The numbers you cited are without considering the 24% undecided voters, and are included here. Pahlevun (talk) 12:13, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
Introduce of a reliable poll[edit]
@Pahlevun: Hello. please see this poll wich based on this. Benyamin-ln (talk) 21:07, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
- Hi, it is already in the article (reference number one). Thank you. Pahlevun (talk) 11:24, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Unknown polls and article format[edit]
User:GTVM92: Please do not add polls without a recognized pollster, this is the least thing we need to know to assess the reliability. And for Iranian-based polling organizations, the results have to be mentioned in a reliable source (like the IRIB poll mentioned by Deutsche Welle) because they are very disputed to be scientific (as the Al-Monitor link suggests). I think we should exclude ISPA, which is known as the only renowned pollster in Iran. At last, we do not need too detailed sections, because the number of polls is very limited and it confuses the reader. Pahlevun (talk) 16:42, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
Poll in Economist[edit]
This one is reliable but not added yet: http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2017/05/daily-chart-14 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.238.195.32 (talk) 17:19, 23 May 2017 (UTC)