Talk:Organisational routines

Article is mostly un-sourced[edit]

Is there reasons why this article is mostly un-sourced. How can it be left on Wikipedia when it is so un-sourced? there are also sections which should be removedHappydaise (talk) 12:14, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Happydaise: Feel free to add sources or to remove parts that you think should be removed (but, you have to explain removal). Being unsourced is not one of WP:criteria for deletion. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:27, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How do we go about adding something at the top of the article - to make it clear that it is un-sourced?Happydaise (talk) 23:42, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Happydaise: Actually there is already a message at the top of the article that reads "This article includes a list of references, but its sources remain unclear because it has insufficient inline citations." Vanjagenije (talk) 00:02, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

oh okay then. Thanks for taking the time to answer that question.Happydaise (talk) 00:05, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I just began some type of change to this article. the more i read the more it dawned on me that the whole thing would need to be re-written. Okay my question is what should be done with an article like this - that is so shoddily written that it appears un-salvageable?Happydaise (talk) 06:42, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Happydaise: In such cases we usually remove all excessive unsourced badly written text, and leave only some basic information. Vanjagenije (talk) 07:59, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That makes more sense and appreciate you getting back to me on my question too.Happydaise (talk) 08:20, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I started doing this but I give up -the whole article needs to be re-written i think. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Happydaise (talk • contribs) 09:38, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]