Talk:Originair

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aviation: Airlines

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the airline project.

As this airline was set up very quickly unlike rival KRA it will start flying sooner, so I saw the need to get it going straight away.CHCBOY (talk) 10:54, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New details of the grounding of Originair are being removed frequently from the Originair page. I feel that it is important to keep this here. Rather than delete, perhaps suggest edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unsuspecting (talk • contribs) 09:02, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mostly it was because what you wrote was not actually what the referenced article said. It is also arguable whether WP:RECENT and WP:NOTNEWS have some influence here.Andrewgprout (talk) 23:15, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]