Talk:Ormen Lange (gas field)

Energy Mid‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Norway

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles

This article title should be about the longship[edit]

I find it unreasonable that the article about the original Ormen Lange, i.e. the longship, has been relegated to Ormen Lange (longship) so that this article could occupy the basic name. It should be this article that should come with a parenthesis after the name, i.e. Ormen Lange (gas field). __meco 18:55, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When I wrote the article on the ship, this one was already here. Wikipedia rules say that if one of the topic is much better known, it gets the name. If two or more are about equally known, we need a disambiguation page. In this case, I think that would be the way to go... --Stephan Schulz 19:00, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, so I moved it. --Berland (talk) 22:17, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this article flagged for deletion? It is very useful and necessary. There is nothing here that is not in the public arena so no problems with copyright. And it is useful to know that the field was named after the longship. (Like Sliepner being named after Odin's eight-legged horse.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.69.31.92 (talk) 14:35, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The tag referred to the aerial view of Nyhamna, not the article itself. The copyright issue of the image appears to have been satisfactorily resolved, so I've removed the tag. Mikenorton (talk) 14:55, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]