Talk:Overwork

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Overwork article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Occupational Safety and Health Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Occupational Safety and HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthTemplate:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthOccupational Safety and Health articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was the subject of an educational assignment in Spring 2015. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Hanyang University/Sociology of Everyday Life (Spring 2015)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.

This article was the subject of an educational assignment that ended on 30 June 2019. Further details are available here.

Review: Almost ready[edit]

The article is almost ready for an A-grade, but there are still few things that need to be fixed, as noted last class. As a reminder:

"Emotional Effects" section is unreferenced
"Government and policy markers" section should have a prose form (and references)

Other than that, you are done. Just those minor fixes, and I can award you an A-grade :) Good job! --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:42, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

South Korea[edit]

The second paragraph of the "South Korea" section is written extremely much like an essay, complete with inappropriate person and no sourcing. I would suggest removing it unless any neutral information can be salvaged. Glades12 (talk) 13:19, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I concur, please go ahead. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:05, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Piotrus: I removed it now. Glades12 (talk) 14:24, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright concerns[edit]

And there's more. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:14, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Overall Earwig on 11 November 2023 version. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:46, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to CNN, BBC, New York Times, Hofstra, also McKinney Law 2005. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:54, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Piotrus can you add any info here ? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:14, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

From the first versions. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:25, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Questions about editing[edit]

I'm working on a simpler version of the article, and won't keep any of the content of the previous version, just to be safe. Like it was mentioned - less is more. Will I be able to count on the help of a revisor once I'm done with this version? Once I'm done, should I leave a note on the temporary page to signalize that it can be verified and published again? I would just need to tweak some wording and add a conclusion with some links to other articles. Is that enough? Mdantas0 (talk) 12:22, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mdantas0 I have the temp space watchlisted. You don't have to rewrite the whole article or even most of it; all that is needed is a version that a) has enough information to demonstrate that notability is met and b) is free of copyright violation. I suggest saving all the sources you don't use in a Further reading section. Ping me here when you think it's ready, I'll have a look, and then I'll ping the copyright people, who move it back in to mainspace if they agree it's ready. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:02, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay! I'll double check it this weekend, add some other paragraphs and let you know when I'm done. Thank you for the guidance. Mdantas0 (talk) 19:06, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm done with the review and rewrite of the article. Let me know if there's anything I should add, remove or edit in general! Mdantas0 (talk) 14:39, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will look in later today, Mdantas0-- thanks for the work! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:41, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks from me as well, it's nice to see people willing to fix issues from that long ago. It's appreciated. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 04:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC) SandyGeorgia (Talk) 04:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]