Talk:Padmasree Warrior

Her name is misspelled. It should be spelled Warrier or Varier with is a caste — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.77.116.249 (talk) 14:19, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Untitled

and chief technology officer of Motorola, Inc. (NYSE:MOT) Warrior joined Motorola in 1984 and was appointed its CTO in 2003. Warrior is responsible for the Motorola’s $4.0 billion research and development investment and the efforts of 25,000 engineers. She is an external director on the Board of Corning Corporation (NYSE:GLW).

Before her current position, she was general manager of Thoughtbeam, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Motorola, which was chartered to commercialize GaAs on silicon technology that was developed in the semiconductor sector of Motorola. This position was short-lived, however, because the Thoughtbeam technology was found to be based on erroneous measurements. Her promotion to CTO after this failed venture has been called a "Dilbert moment" by some in the industry.

Warrior also served as corporate vice president and chief technology officer for Motorola’s Semiconductor Products Sector (SPS) which is now Freescale.

This and the article still seem quite favourable for someone who journalists are willing to lambast as "Deadwood". Articles I've read also make the point that she filled a position vacant for 2 years, some inferring more unkind remarks from this too. If anything this addition seems too gentle. -- Horkana (talk) 20:59, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

At this time user User:David8989 has only edited this article on Padmasree Warrior and nothing else. Some edits were trivial, others deleted substantial chunks of the article which were critical of her Career, these have been reinstated/reverted. Without the well cited criticisms without discussion, the article feels unbalanced, reading all too much like a press release, listing achievements and job positions. These criticisms do not seem unfair, discussion before deletion would be appreciated. -- Horkana (talk) 18:00, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

I see from the edit history the article referring to her as deadwood was previously referenced in the article, providing some contrast to the glowing remarks from the CEO of Cisco but was removed by user PWarrior who removed various other bits of criticism (most of which has been reverted several times). -- Horkana (talk) 01:51, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

The criticisms come from a spread of accounts, the reverts come from newly created accounts with little or no history. If you want to remove the criticisms then provide counter points or at the very least rephrase the bland praise and talk of here initiatives that read like a press release that the criticisms seem to be in reaction to. -- Horkana (talk) 06:47, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Unwilling to continually revert those who insist on deleting the critical counterpoints I've instead trimmed the fat out of this article. Without the fluff and praise the missing criticism is less noticeable. The sections for Leadership/Directorships and Awards are still terribly sycophantic and read more like a Resumé struggling to portray everything in the best light than a neutral or objective encyclopedia article.

Added NPOV tag to help indicate how disputed this article has been and how it had been repeatedly whitewashed of criticisms, and the Directorships and Recognition still seems far to sycophantic and too much like unbalanced PR fluff without the corresponding criticism. -- Horkana (talk)

References

Education

Raised near Chennai in Southern India, Warrior received a bachelor’s degree in chemical engineering from India Institute of Technology, New Delhi, from which she was recently recognized with the Distinguished Alumni Award. She holds masters in chemical engineering from Cornell University and serves as an advisory board member at both schools.

Recognition

On behalf of Motorola, Warrior accepted the 2004 National Medal of Technology from the President of the United States.

Fortune Magazine called her one of four rising stars on it Most Powerful Women list[1] and the Economic Times recently ranked Padmasree as the 11th Most Influential Global Indian[ttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1073963.cmshttp:/economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1073963.cms]. In 2001 she was one of six women nationwide selected to receive the "Women Elevating Science and Technology" award from Working Woman Magazine[2] and her achievements were further recognized by American Immigration Law Foundation in 2003[3].

Industry & Community Leadership

Padmasree serves on the boards of Chicago’s Joffrey Ballet and Museum of Science and Industry, the Singapore Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Chicago Mayor’s Technology Council, Cornell University Engineering Council and advisory council of Indian Institute of Technology. She previously served on the Texas Governor's Council for Digital Economy, the Technology Advisory Council for the FCC and on the Advisory Committee for the Computing and Information Science and Engineering of the National Science Foundation (NSF). She is also serving as a mentor in the State Department’s International Women Leaders Mentoring Partnership.

Mediathink 13:13, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Proposing the above. Please comment

Mediathink 13:50, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Migrated the proposed entry to article section. Citation needed for "erroneous measurements" leading to short life. Mediathink 01:43, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Biography assessment rating comment

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Hornandsoccer^Talk 02:10, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Image Changed

Image changed to more accurately reflect subject's appearance Mediathink 16:28, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Previous image was removed by someone else because of copyright ambiguity. Uploaded my own photo so there was one. -- Joi 09:58, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

This article is utterly unprofessional and is befitting of a supermarket gossip rag.

While I understand that Warrior was not well liked, this kind of potentially libelous information does not belong in an Encyclopedia. Further, edits cleaning up nasty comments have been reverted, e.g.:

1. (cur) (last) 03:52, 6 December 2007 207.10.229.192 (Talk) (6,048 bytes) (Undid revision 176081398 by Pwarrior (talk) Bringing back the referenced information.) (undo)
2. (cur) (last) 03:36, 6 December 2007 Pwarrior (Talk | contribs) (5,583 bytes) (→Career - Be nice, please.) (undo)

Including Bearded Women as a category is not only an embarrassment to the writers; it destroys any shred of credibility this entry may have.

69.209.229.28 (talk) 21:27, 9 December 2007 (UTC)SpickyBecky

What is this neutrality dispute about?

What is this neutrality dispute about? Someone has added a tag but provided no justification. Shall I remove it? NBeale (talk) 16:51, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Note how the article reads like a press release. Read the talk page. Note the sections that were suggested and how it contains positive and negative remarks. Take a look at some of the older revisions from February of 2009 which contain both positive and negative opinions, some very harsh negative opinions. I tried to preserve some of the negative opinions to balance out the fluff of this article, but some editors (what seemed to be sock puppets) continued to delete any criticism without discussion or consensus. I wasn't the only one who had tried to preserve the article, it wasn't even my edits I was trying to keep. Rather than continue to fight the fluff and astroturfing with balance I tried to trim it back to a more manageable less sycophantic article (completely inappropriate if you see how much well sourced criticism there was before). The article is still fairly lopsided, you'd almost think Warrior didn't have any critics. -- Horkana (talk) 04:46, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

I still believe this article is heavily imbalanced given the extensive amount of criticism that was previously deleted. I understand Wikipedia articles need not include criticism but amount of praise and awards listed are missing essential context, in that she was savagely criticized and to list only the praise is highly selective and far too biased in her favour. Wikipedia makes it too difficult to prevent editors from repeatedly deleting content and it was too frustrating to continue fighting it. I don't have the time and energy to fight editors unwilling to act in good faith and discuss the criticisms so I wanted to make this last comment and confirm there remains a neutrality problem with this article before I take this page off my watch list and leave it to others who might be interested in improving the article. -- Horkana (talk) 01:49, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Padmasree Warrior. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1073963.cms

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:56, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Date of birth is needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.252.95.217 (talk) 04:11, 11 October 2020 (UTC)