Talk:Painkiller Jane

Powers

Hi, i know NOTHING about this character and was wondering if somebody would help me with a list of powers?? she seems interesting. The article is a bit rubishy, but at least powers are cleared up now. thanx.If the made-for-tv movie has been released and there are spoiler tags in place then there is no reason why the entire film story cannot be told. At the moment it just resembles a teaser. — ChocolateRoses ^talk

Split

I have suggested as split to Painkiller Jane (film) as the section is large enough to form a good start to an entry. It needs editting and expanding (characters and info box for example) but that would start to swamp the main entry. (Emperor 16:06, 6 February 2007 (UTC))

I agree that it should be moved, it is pretty much crowding the main entry as is now. I think it can be edited somewhat before it moves though. -Electricbolt 02:33, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

I would suggest that the new page should be Painkiller Jane (TV series) since the TV movie was basically the pilot for the new series. —MJBurrage • TALK • 02:19, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

I agree we should split it

I think it should be split into a page Painkiller Jane (Film) Because the TV Series will not be based on the movie

Fair use rationale for Image:Painkiller jane01.jpg

Image:Painkiller jane01.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:05, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

LGBT?

There is nothing in this article or related articles that discusses or even suggests that the character is LGBT. If this is in fact the case, then some detail should be expanded upon. If this is a frivolous claim, then it should be removed from the LGBT project/category. Ham Pastrami 05:25, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

She has a very pasionate kiss with another woman in issue #1 of the new Dynamite series. That should more than sugest the character's probable Bisexuality. Paulwharton 17:55, 07 July 2007 (UTC)

...so, it might be a good idea to note this in the article. Instead of leaving it to the Talk page with no explanation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.235.60.11 (talk) 16:40, August 24, 2007 (UTC)

Hell, she had sex with her on a semi-public beach at least once. - —Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.56.176.131 (talk • contribs) at 21:35 on 24 April 2008

Agree, this connection should somewhere be mentioned in the article. Likeanechointheforest (talk)

origin

the various origins should be identified instead of singling a specific one out as special 70.55.203.112 (talk) 02:47, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Painkiller Jane. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/television/news/e3id44a9b9dc70d8043248a55a6921ec359

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:20, 31 March 2016 (UTC)