Talk:Palaeoarchaeology

This article was nominated for deletion on 30 June 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Anthropology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Archaeology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

186.160.54.138 (talk) 15:00, 30 June 2010 (UTC) This article has been vandalized by user RHaworth[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 11 February 2020 and 1 May 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): AnthroJen.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 06:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled[edit]

Because he has changed the update of March 19, 2010. this act recuce the quality of this article. == —Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.160.54.138 (talk) 14:57, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weird[edit]

Wait what? Study, of the old old? This definitely doesn't need to be a whole article. PatHadley (talk) 00:05, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

merge with paleoanthropology?[edit]

I would suggest either deleting this article or merging it with paleoanthropology - the more commonly-used term for the discipline that studies human origins from paleontological and archaeological perspectives. Any objections? Ninafundisha (talk) 13:52, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

After thinking about this a bit more, I think what I'll do is merge the paragraph about the history of prehistoric archaeology with the prehistoric archaeology page, and then put a mention on the paleoanthropology page that alternative terms might include paleoarchaeology. Sound okay to everyone? Ninafundisha (talk) 13:06, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits[edit]

Hi AnthroJen, thank you for your contribution to this article. Unfortunately I've had to undo it for now because to me it seemed to make a substantive change to the content, but didn't include any references to reliable sources to support that change. In fact your edit removed all the existing references, perhaps unintentionally, which is generally not something we want to do.

If you could provide some references to support your version please do feel free to restore it.

Also, please do not change the spelling of palaeoarchaeology from the one used in the article title. – Joe (talk) 10:59, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Some edits[edit]

Hello, I have made some edits in this article that I thought would enhance it. However, I believe further and deeper changes should take place in it too. ACebeiro (talk) 22:30, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]