Talk:Passage (Willis novel)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I added the ending to the plot summary. We need some names here, but I don't have a copy with me. 68.49.175.198 22:11, 6 May 2007 (UTC) Sorry, I posted that, forgot to log in. Tigger89 22:12, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just finished reading this book last night.  :) Here is an incomplete list of characters:
  • The main character is Joanna Lander.
  • The neurologist who performs the RIPT scans is Richard Wright.
  • Joanna's best friend, who works in the ER, is Vielle Howard.
  • The charlatan researcher is Maurice Mandrake.
  • The pathological liar guy is Ed Wojakowski.
  • The girl who needs the heart transplant is Maisie Nellis.
  • Joanna Lander's English teacher, who has Alzheimer's, is Pat Briarley.
  • Mr. Briarley's niece is Kit Gardiner.
Hope that helps! - carolyn81 (usertalk) 14:57, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I just edited your ending. It is clear that Joanna doesn't remember everything at the end, there is no indication in the story that the ship is actually aware of Joanna and Helen floating on the water, and even as it's likely that they had been spotted (and reasonable to assume that that and the rescue would happen, as it's all in Joanna's dying/dead mind), them being rescued and welcomed aboard is not actually part of the text. Imfa11ingup (talk) 08:37, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! Can I suggest adding a paragraph break in the first parag under "Plot." So far, it reads: "... exactly the way his books describe NDEs. Dr. Richard Wright, a neurologist who has discovered ..."
Dr. Wright is important in his own right, no pun intended, and I think it's important to separate him from Mandrake.
A new reader might think that the two are working along the same lines, whereas they are almost enemies.
Thoughts?
Thanks!
FiverFan65 (talk) 16:04, 9 July 2012 (UTC)FiverFan65[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:ConnieWillis Passage.jpg[edit]

Image:ConnieWillis Passage.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:16, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Passage (Willis novel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:08, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]