Talk:Passing of Peregrinus

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Greece Low‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled][edit]

I enjoyed this article thanks lou!

Comment copied from Lucian on Jesus[edit]

The following comment is copied from Talk:Lucian on Jesus. Cynwolfe (talk) 20:34, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is a report of three passages from the same work of Lucian, by somebody who hasn't read it, based on sources which are not reliable.

To begin with, the Death of Peregrinus is not a play, as this source calls it - thus proving itself unreliable; it's a (somewhat fictionalized) muckraking biography of one of Lucian's contemporaries, who - as one stage of a long and colorful career of religious entrepreneurship - became a Christian. Therefore the suggestion that it refers to the Church of James the Just is anachronism; it's about the Church of Lucian's own time. (And, consulting MacLeod's Lucian, Peregrinus died at the Games of 165; his period as a Christian prophet cannot be in James' time.)

Lucian's rhetoric about history is twice irrelevant; this isn't history, and the extent to which Lucian lived up to that conventional claim (a commonplace parallelled throughout antiquity) may be judged by the only work he called a history: the Vera Historia, about a man carried to the moon by a waterspout, who helps its inhabitants in their war with the inhabitants of the Sun - and I omit its less plausible narrative. I have, therefore, removed the apologetic about Lucian's unbesmirched reputation for truth-telling, which is like relying on Pooh-Bah. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 19:41, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]