Talk:Paul Gourley

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

South Dakota Low‑importance

	South Dakota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Dakota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of South Dakota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South DakotaWikipedia:WikiProject South DakotaTemplate:WikiProject South DakotaSouth Dakota articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

VFD[edit]

Please note that this article was once deleted as the result of a vote for deletion. See details here. In this VFD I voted delete, however I do not feel strongly enough to nominate this page for another round of deletion votings. Oliver Keenan 15:15, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

April 2006[edit]

I think someone should talk about the shady upcomings up Gourley and how he bought votes to win. As a delegate who actually voted for Gourley, I certainly see it as a mistake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.102.159.252 (talk) 22 April, 2006.

November 2006[edit]

This article seems to be an exercise in sheer vanity. It should be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eshatologist (talk • contribs) 19 November, 2006.

January 2007[edit]

Rather than deleting it, it should be revised to talk about the controversy surrounding Gourley. Maybe someone should mention that the College Republicans on facebook.com have started a group stating that they would rather have Stewie Griffen as chairman. rlee1185 05:48, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edited all the opinion, analysis, and editorializing out of the article. Previous iterations of article was taken verbatim from CRNC website. Guest 10:46, 23 January 2007 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.242.94.33 (talk) [reply]

This is an article talk page, please respect the other editors![edit]

I restored the two comments above that were deleted by 69.242.94.33. Removing others' comments is technically referred to as 'Talk Page Vandalism' (see WP:VANDAL). Everyone, please sign your comments! New editors that prefer not to log in may find that their work is not taken as seriously as it deserves. The new editor has done nothing but edit this one article, so he has no track record of work elsewhere on Wikipedia. I added new headings to clarify when all the comments were added.EdJohnston 04:23, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of Chairs?[edit]

Anyone have a list of CRNC chairs? Also, what about any of Gourley's exec board and staffers? Will get working on the Charlie Smith page soon.--RedShiftPA (talk) 19:18, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Paul Gourley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071230014714/http://dir.salon.com/story/news/feature/2005/05/25/blackwell/index.html to http://dir.salon.com/story/news/feature/2005/05/25/blackwell/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:53, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]