Talk:Paul Sheehan (journalist)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Australia

	Australia portal Paul Sheehan (journalist) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Journalism

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Sheehan is a conservative???[edit]

I notice that the references given to support the statement that Sheehan is a conservative are a little odd. ~~The first reference is to a link that has Sheehan being asked (presumably as a liberal) to get "get rid of these right-wing ranters"~~, the other two are not from sources that I would not have considered WP:RS for a BLP. Can we get a better source? Thepm (talk) 04:03, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Posted to BLP noticeboard here. Thepm (talk) 05:26, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Switzer, opinion page editor of The Australian, said that "the ranks of the Right have swelled to include .... best-selling author Paul Sheehan" [1]

Dr Patricia Ranald, Co-convenor, Australian Fair Trade and Investment Network, wrote "Conservative commentator Paul Sheehan wrote ..." [2]

Terry Cook of the World Socialist wrote "Writing in Monday’s Sydney Morning Herald right-wing correspondent Paul Sheehan claimed..." [3]

If you have something —anything— that indicates he is not conservative, then these sources would carry less weight. ► RATEL ◄ 07:07, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I had misread that first ref as being written by Sheehan. I've struck out my comment. May bad. I apologise.

Having said that, I am concerned that we label him conservative, rather than noting that "some call him" conservative, or "regarded by many" as conservative. I notice for example that neither Andrew Bolt nor Miranda Devine are prefixed with the epithet "conservative", although either of them would be more worthy. Bill O'Reilly to use another example, is "widely considered a conservative" in his article.

Would you be agreeable to adopting a structure along these lines? If so, I'd like to invite you to make the change. cheers Thepm (talk) 07:32, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done, time to remove the BLP section or mark it with the tag {{resolved}} which gives

Resolved

► RATEL ◄ 09:38, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. I've added the tag to the BLP section as requested. One final point is that the second and third references seem to detract from the article in my opinion. They're both fairly fringe publications and you already have an RS as your reference. I'd take them out and just leave the Aus as the reference, but I'll leave it to you to decide. Thanks again for the edit. Thepm (talk) 09:46, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

'His writing has appeared in...'[edit]

A quick search reveals that the para from which this sentence is taken, is lifted entirely from his book publishers' bio of him. Whether it is true or not, and whether it is attributed or not, it's surely not up to encyclopedia standards to just recycle word-for-word commercial bios. And sorry, no, I haven't been bold (read 'interested') enough to just re-write it myself.

(My quick search reveals that Paul Sheehan's work has indeed appeared in the New Yorker: a grand total of once, in February 1996. A 3-page piece on his collection of crack vials. The following link may require subscription: http://archives.newyorker.com/?i=1996-02-12#folio=058). Have my football-playing skills featured on the MCG, if I kicked my ball out there once at the end of a match? 121.44.113.178 (talk) 13:29, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]