Talk:Peach Fuzz (comics)

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by United States comics work group.

, is an English-language comic syndicated in many major U.S. newspapers by Tokyopop, including the San Francisco Chronicle. Due to this, it belongs in ~~both~~ the 'Comics' ~~and 'Anime and Manga'~~ WikiProjects. --Geopgeop 11:35, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, according to WikiProject Anime and manga, it actually does not qualify for inclusion there. Removing it. --Geopgeop 11:51, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

order of the top?[edit]

The top of Peach Fuzz includes "(..) originally published in January 11, 2005 by TOKYOPOP. Peach Fuzz originally started as a short 17-page story in TOKYOPOP's 2nd Rising Stars of Manga competition, (..)". I have 3 suggestions (1) the Rising Stars of Manga be mentioned first (jaredandlindsay.com says 2nd RSoM publication date was "December 1, 2003" (2) The "originally published" sentence be changed to something like "The first Peach Fuzz book was (..)" and (3) start date be added to newspaper bit. So the top would look something like: "Peach Fuzz originally started as a short 17-page story in TOKYOPOP's 2nd Rising Stars of Manga competition (published December 1, 2003), where it placed as Grand Prize. The first Peach Fuzz book was originally published in January 11, 2005 by TOKYOPOP. In January 2006 the series started appearing in a Sunday comic strip form within Sunday newspaper comics sections." What do others think of these suggestions? --EarthFurst 17:19, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Synopsis[edit]

The two paragraphs in the synopsis section are essentially repeats of the same info, but I can't figger out how to merge them. Lots42 00:25, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

completed?[edit]

Article currently says "Original run January 11 2005- ongoing". http://jaredandlindsay.com/aboutus.html says "Having recently wrapped up production on their Peach Fuzz graphic novel series with volume 3, the pair are looking toward the future into pursuing any number of possible projects." It sounds like volume 3 is the last book in the series, so I'm thinking the original run should give end date of "December 11 2007". --EarthFurst (talk) 04:26, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Puffball's Death[edit]

As it is now, the article states that Puffball's death was due to him being crushed by a recliner chair. However, in the comic, when Mimi asks her mother where she found him, her mother simply states, "Dad's recliner." Does it ever explicitly state that he was crushed by the recliner? When I read the comic, I always imagined that he just dropped dead on the chair and the chair itself was unrelated to his death. Chinchy (talk) 15:34, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Peach Fuzz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:06, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]